I was about to build the tham 15 mk2, but I came across this project made in russia.
It seems to have more compression than the tham, but I can be wrong.
What do you think?
this is a photo of the realization that I managed to download, even if it is an active version, (I do not get along well with the Russian language and I could not find much about it)
I wonder if the amp in the expansion chamber gives rise to the expansion of the sound ..
I know it's not a tham, but I've seen that they use it with a tse111 so I guess it has less holes at the top .. what do you think could be better than the tham mk2?
Someone would be able to get the measures for horn resp?
It seems to have more compression than the tham, but I can be wrong.
What do you think?
this is a photo of the realization that I managed to download, even if it is an active version, (I do not get along well with the Russian language and I could not find much about it)
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
I wonder if the amp in the expansion chamber gives rise to the expansion of the sound ..
I know it's not a tham, but I've seen that they use it with a tse111 so I guess it has less holes at the top .. what do you think could be better than the tham mk2?
Someone would be able to get the measures for horn resp?
With a TSE111? So what goes between the TSE's (250Hz) and the tapped horns (roughly 120-150Hz)? They are not gonna sound nice going up to 250... well none of the TH's I've ever heard have.
And, that woodwork for the amp in the path will significantly alter the output. It looks like over half of the area is obstructed.
And, that woodwork for the amp in the path will significantly alter the output. It looks like over half of the area is obstructed.
The build looks quite a bit different to the drawing. The compression seems to be less and there's a discontinuity around the first bend.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.