Testing amplifier output?

Status
Not open for further replies.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_mean_square

Peak-to-peak
{\displaystyle =2{\sqrt {2}}\times {\text{RMS}}\approx 2.8\times {\text{RMS}}.}


WaveformVariables and operatorsRMS
DC
{\displaystyle y=A_{0}\,}
{\displaystyle A_{0}\,}
Sine wave
{\displaystyle y=A_{1}\sin(2\pi ft)\,}
{\displaystyle {\frac {A_{1}}{\sqrt {2}}}}
 
Your post 11 is correct but a diode peak detector is not rms conversion so not a very argument.

But don't take my word for it. Look at posts 3, 9, 11, and if you believe them, also post 12. They conform to the Wikipedia page.
 
I am just telling you what I know.
The rectification post was obviously "full wave".
There appears to be something you don't understand.

The situation of measuring amplifier output power is something I am very familiar with.
Working for the importing/distributer of BGW amplifiers in Australia >
we had a policy of measuring & testing every amplifier for distribution.
On a near monthly basis I was responsible for testing output power of amplifiers 😎
 
Last edited:
The fact is that > RMS voltage , squared , divided by load resistance = WATTS.

( I dare say to invest in a true RMS volt-meter, and double check your PtoP measurements )

Follow your own advice: get a sine wave on your scope so you can observe peak-to-peak and monitor with an rms voltmeter.

The argument is two to one in voltage, four to one in power. Better make sure you’re correct.

😏
 
  • Like
Reactions: chermann
I am just telling you what I know.
The rectification post was obviously "full wave".
There appears to be something you don't understand.

The situation of measuring amplifier output power is something I am very familiar with.
Working for the importing/distributer of BGW amplifiers in Australia >
we had a policy of measuring & testing every amplifier for distribution.
On a near monthly basis I was responsible for testing output power of amplifiers 😎

And this is how Chinese watts (as they are also called here) are born, and you end up with more audio power in a car than its engine has.
I remember many years ago, at a stall there were tape recorders for sale and on some it was written 1200W PMPO but the consumption was 5-7W from the mains, a real perpetuum mobile, put in 7W and get out 1500W.
In your place, I would be ashamed to say something like that.
 
I am just telling you what I know.
The rectification post was obviously "full wave".
There appears to be something you don't understand.

The situation of measuring amplifier output power is something I am very familiar with.
Working for the importing/distributer of BGW amplifiers in Australia >
we had a policy of measuring & testing every amplifier for distribution.
On a near monthly basis I was responsible for testing output power of amplifiers 😎
The full-wave rectification (fortuitously) achieves the divide by two necessary to calculate power. In terms of heating a resistor, it doesn't matter what the polarity of the voltage across it is (otherwise it would get cold on negative half-cycles!) - this is why the p-p voltage is divided by two.
In simple terms, P=V^2/R, but remember polarity isn't important. That is why it's the peak voltage/sqrt(2), not peak-to-peak.
Did the importer of BGW provide any training?
 
So, with your 50v peak to peak, convert it to RMS by dividing it by 1.414 = 35.36V RMS.
Then square your 35.36V = 35.36 x 35.36 = 1250.33 . Then divide that by your OHMS > and you get WATTS.
1250.33 divided by 4 (ohms) = 312.5 Watts.
1250.33 divided by 8 (ohms) = 156.3 Watts.
( these power levels are RMS )
I think you didn't read this thread before replying - this is wrong and covered in detail above!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.