TangBand 8"
Hi
Do any of you have any experience with the W8-740C woofer
from TangBand.
I’m weary interested in this Speaker and it would be nice if you
gave me your experience with this speaker.
If you have a link to a DIY project with this speaker please post.
Hi
Do any of you have any experience with the W8-740C woofer
from TangBand.
I’m weary interested in this Speaker and it would be nice if you
gave me your experience with this speaker.
If you have a link to a DIY project with this speaker please post.
I am using the 740C with two 8" drones and am happy. It's a good woofer for the money especially now that it's on sale at PE. I bought mine over a year ago and the price has gone up since then so it's nice to see it on sale for those who want to try it.
I saw that on sale at PE this weekend. It has a foam surround. Nuff said. The useful lifetime of foam is better matched to beer than speaker drivers.
If people would stop buying that garbage, they'd stop manufacturing it. Hello!
If people would stop buying that garbage, they'd stop manufacturing it. Hello!
rcavictim said:The useful lifetime of foam is better matched to beer than speaker drivers.
While I like the humour, I've never had a foam give out on me while I was still using the speaker. I've noticed you get 15 years or more from foam, let alone a treated foam so I've not made that a consideration. I've heard there are those that consider the foam to be better sonically than the synthetic rubbers but I'll leave that to the experts, I don't have an opinion.
If people would stop buying that garbage, they'd stop manufacturing it. Hello! [/B]
Hello!, that garbage is just right for some people, you know, like those on a limited budget or those whose ears aren't golden, that don't really have a use for anything more?
Actually, it's not a bad little woofer if you put 20 watts or less into it, you know, the volume most people listen?
Oh yee, so fast to judge. It may not be a woofer worth writing home about but it's fine for a lot of people. Beats the heck out of what was available 20 years ago for the same price.
mine tb woofer is on its way...
I plugged the numbers into winisd and i get a box (3/4" mdf) ext dimensions of 9" by 14" by 22" (approx) with an 11" long 3" dia port...
Is it me or does that port seem a little short to be tuned to 30ish hertz?
Also, should i try and tune the sub lower than 30hz since i will be using the mcm 150 watt plate amp (back in stock, 500 some left...) with 6db bass boost at 30 hz?
If anyone has a proven design that will work well for this sub please by all means post it...
I plugged the numbers into winisd and i get a box (3/4" mdf) ext dimensions of 9" by 14" by 22" (approx) with an 11" long 3" dia port...
Is it me or does that port seem a little short to be tuned to 30ish hertz?
Also, should i try and tune the sub lower than 30hz since i will be using the mcm 150 watt plate amp (back in stock, 500 some left...) with 6db bass boost at 30 hz?
If anyone has a proven design that will work well for this sub please by all means post it...
rcavictim, just find us cheap rubber that will do 1 inch peak to peak...
Then, for real subwoofer drivers, find us rubber that can do ~4 to 5 inches peak to peak...
Then, for real subwoofer drivers, find us rubber that can do ~4 to 5 inches peak to peak...
simon5 said:rcavictim, just find us cheap rubber that will do 1 inch peak to peak...
Then, for real subwoofer drivers, find us rubber that can do ~4 to 5 inches peak to peak...
Source surround materials? I don't have to. I'm not in the driver manufacturing business. As a consumer I have purchased drivers which had foam surrounds brand new and within my life so far they have completely rotted to uselesness. I don't like to have to spend my money to buy something more than once. I do not consider loudspeaker drivers as consumable items like tubes. I have 50 year old Altec drivers that are practically as good as the day they were made.
Now if you are punishing a driver to 4 and five inches cone excursion, that probably IS a consumable item. I think I'd be looking at improving my acoustic cone loading if I had to go to those extremes. I can't imagine the fidelity could be very good.
50 yrs old and still good? Nice! But I'm 100% sure that the T/S parameters are shifted alot vs. original.
Rubber got problems too, mostly with increasing stiffness over time.
BTW foam surrounds can be replaced for a very small fee. You also get the new foam which last longer. Using a foam surround also help you to reach higher efficiency numbers.
Anything with moving parts doesn't last a lifetime. Also, any speaker manufactured more than ~15 years ago are outdated. Today with new technology you can find/build something better for cheaper.
Rubber got problems too, mostly with increasing stiffness over time.
BTW foam surrounds can be replaced for a very small fee. You also get the new foam which last longer. Using a foam surround also help you to reach higher efficiency numbers.
Anything with moving parts doesn't last a lifetime. Also, any speaker manufactured more than ~15 years ago are outdated. Today with new technology you can find/build something better for cheaper.
Cal Weldon said:
While I like the humour, I've never had a foam give out on me while I was still using the speaker. I've noticed you get 15 years or more from foam, let alone a treated foam so I've not made that a consideration. I've heard there are those that consider the foam to be better sonically than the synthetic rubbers but I'll leave that to the experts, I don't have an opinion.
Hello!, that garbage is just right for some people, you know, like those on a limited budget or those whose ears aren't golden, that don't really have a use for anything more?
Actually, it's not a bad little woofer if you put 20 watts or less into it, you know, the volume most people listen?
Oh yee, so fast to judge. It may not be a woofer worth writing home about but it's fine for a lot of people. Beats the heck out of what was available 20 years ago for the same price.
Cal,
You almost sound upset. I was in no way putting down your speaker system. I didn't say this TangBand 8"er is not a good woofer new out of the box. In fact I said nothing about it except for pointing out that it has a foam surround and that IMO any drivers with foam surrounds should be boycotted. because it is a known fact that foam surrounds rot.
To clarify, my use of the term "garbage" was about foam, not about any other aspect of drivers employing foam surrounds.
I totally support your statement that it (the TangBand 8"er) beats anything available 20 years ago for the same dough.
Foam doesn't necessarily stigmatize a cheap driver. I have seen some very impressive subwoofer drivers in the almost $500 each range that read well right up to the part where I see the word foam surround and just have to stop and shake my head. Well, they won't see any of MY money.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Subwoofers
- TangBand 8"