BTW Allen, Did you have or create the FRD file for that ?Just out of interest..
View attachment 1011066
You can't deny a house curve. I don't subscribe to the idea that a tweeter looks flat and that's how it's supposed to be.
The thing most people seem to either ignore or just don't understand about is personal hearing differences and room acoustics that can definitely relate to what they hear.Just out of interest..
View attachment 1011066
You can't deny a house curve. I don't subscribe to the idea that a tweeter looks flat and that's how it's supposed to be.
They're worried about a 'flat response', yet what about their own hearing abilities?
You might be able to design a 'perfect on paper' speaker system, and it might sound like crap to you.
There are many variables to the mix.
Yes, thank you.I made one from your plot in post #8, do you want a copy?
Thank you so much.The image doesn't show the sensitivity. If you do anything that depends on it, you'll need to bump the level in the simulator.
Mike,Between 3.5K and 7K there is a 6dB rise. Since we need to pad the tweeter down a bit anyway it would be nice to flatten that out a bit.
The 075/2402 -6dB point at 3.5kHz is around 100 degree, by 10kHz only 40 degrees, 7.5kHz around half the dispersion (50 degrees) as at 3.5kHz.
If you don't "toe in" the speakers, and listen center (off axis), the high frequency reduction will likely be more than the on-axis gain due to the rising DI (directivity index).
Art
Something to keep in mind thanks. I am also considering bouncing it off of a deflector which of course would change things up a bit too.Mike,
The 075/2402 -6dB point at 3.5kHz is around 100 degree, by 10kHz only 40 degrees, 7.5kHz around half the dispersion (50 degrees) as at 3.5kHz.
View attachment 1015691
If you don't "toe in" the speakers, and listen center (off axis), the high frequency reduction will likely be more than the on-axis gain due to the rising DI (directivity index).
Art
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Taming rising tweeter response