• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

TAJ's Harman Kardon Citation V rebuild thread

This resistor inconsistency got me to wondering. So I went to the attic and took a look at my HK Citation 5 which I inherited through the New Jersey Audio Society a few years back. Mine also has 10K ½W resistors as R18, 19, 40 & 41. They can be seen in the picture below. Further, the original parts list says they are 10K. Now I wonder if there is not a print error on the schematic.
 

Attachments

  • HKCT V.JPG
    HKCT V.JPG
    124.7 KB · Views: 432
  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    503.2 KB · Views: 355
  • scan0002.jpg
    scan0002.jpg
    313.6 KB · Views: 355
Last edited:
This resistor inconsistency got me to wondering. So I went to the attic and took a look at my HK Citation 5 which I inherited through the New Jersey Audio Society a few years back. Mine also has 10K ½W resistors as R18, 19, 40 & 41. They can be seen in the picture below. Further, the original parts list says they are 10K. Now I wonder if there is not a print error on the schematic.

Perhaps you should pass your findings on to Jim McShane. "Mr. Citation" may have input useful to all of this thread's posters.
 
Mine also has 10K ½W resistors as R18, 19, 40 & 41. They can be seen in the picture below. Further, the original parts list says they are 10K. Now I wonder if there is not a print error on the schematic.

HollowState,

Does your original paper schematic match the scanned schematic you posted? (Assuming you have one.) A closer look at the scan (in post #18 above) shows it may have once said 10k as there is an obvious gap where a missing second digit probably lived. The other nearby 1k values don't have that additional space available.

Did the original docs include the schematic?

..Todd
 
Last edited:
HollowState,
Does your original paper schematic match the scanned schematic you posted?
Did the original docs include the schematic?
Yes in both cases. And yes it does seem to have a space where a 0 could have, or should have, been. I have emailed Jim. And I am now thinking it is 10KΩ. The original schematic is an 11 by 17 fold out.
 
Last edited:
This was Jim's reply.

Hi Victor,

"I supply 1K carbon comp resistors in those positions. They work well, and since the power tubes are pentodes there is essentially zero Miller effect. so 1K it is."

"If you look close at the schematic it looks like there should be a zero in there after the 1 on two of them, but the other two show a “normal” 1K print."

"I will tell you there’s no harm in using 1K, but if 10K is what is used in the amp you have then don’t worry. It’s not an issue. It may have been an error or a running change."

Regards,
Jim McShane
McShane Design

Apparently either value works ok. What I do see happening is a reduction in negative bias voltage applied to the grids. This occurs because the ends of the centering pot are brought closer to ground with a 1K instead of 10K. So the outputs will run a little hotter. But it may not be enough to matter much.
 
This was Jim's reply.

Hi Victor,

"I supply 1K carbon comp resistors in those positions. They work well, and since the power tubes are pentodes there is essentially zero Miller effect. so 1K it is."

"If you look close at the schematic it looks like there should be a zero in there after the 1 on two of them, but the other two show a “normal” 1K print."

"I will tell you there’s no harm in using 1K, but if 10K is what is used in the amp you have then don’t worry. It’s not an issue. It may have been an error or a running change."

Regards,
Jim McShane
McShane Design

Apparently either value works ok. What I do see happening is a reduction in negative bias voltage applied to the grids. This occurs because the ends of the centering pot are brought closer to ground with a 1K instead of 10K. So the outputs will run a little hotter. But it may not be enough to matter much.

The 1K resistors are grid stoppers. One end of the 1K goes to the tube grid which has a VERY high resistance. You aren't likely to see any other than a very TINY change. The current through that resistor is maybe a few microamps.

You DO need to pay attention to the bias voltage though, since H-K ran the power tubes so close to their limits - or even over spec.
 
Let us assume the wiper on the pot (R15) is set in its center position. A quick calculation leads me to the following conclusions:

If R18 and R19 are 1k both output tubes will have approximately -15 V on their grids.
If R18 and R19 are 10k both output tubes will have approximately -43 V on their grids.
If R18 and R19 are 15k both output tubes will have approximately -46 V on their grids.

The correct value is definitely not 1k.

Torben
 
Last edited:
Let us assume the wiper on the pot (R15) is set in its center position. A quick calculation leads me to the following conclusions:

If R18 and R19 are 1k both output tubes will have approximately -15 V on their grids.
If R18 and R19 are 10k both output tubes will have approximately -43 V on their grids.
If R18 and R19 are 15k both output tubes will have approximately -46 V on their grids.

The correct value is definitely not 1k.

Torben


That's good information. Thanks Torben.
 
Just curious, what is the impedance the output transformer is presenting to the output tubes (assuming the appropriate speaker load is connected)?

..Todd

The SAMS should list it if you have access to it. Otherwise you can do a simple test to determine it:
Take a loose output transformer and connect 120v (wall voltage) to the extreme ends of the primary. Take a meter reading of the voltage at the 16 ohm tap. Also take a voltage reading of the voltage going into the transformer. The more accurate the measurements, the better. These 2 voltages will give you the winding ratio (primary v / 16 ohm tap v)
So to figure out primary impedance, it's (turns ratio squared) X 16 = primary impedance.
 
The SAMS should list it if you have access to it. Otherwise you can do a simple test to determine it:
Take a loose output transformer and connect 120v (wall voltage) to the extreme ends of the primary. Take a meter reading of the voltage at the 16 ohm tap. Also take a voltage reading of the voltage going into the transformer. The more accurate the measurements, the better. These 2 voltages will give you the winding ratio (primary v / 16 ohm tap v)
So to figure out primary impedance, it's (turns ratio squared) X 16 = primary impedance.

Thanks. I'll check the Sams docs when I get home. Yes, I know how to measure it, but I wanted to ask first in case it's common knowledge.

..Todd
 
This resistor inconsistency got me to wondering. So I went to the attic and took a look at my HK Citation 5 which I inherited through the New Jersey Audio Society a few years back. Mine also has 10K ½W resistors as R18, 19, 40 & 41. They can be seen in the picture below. Further, the original parts list says they are 10K. Now I wonder if there is not a print error on the schematic.

My Citation V manual has a typed addendum sheet that states:

CITATION V ADDENDUM SHEET

Before proceeding with the construction of your kit please make the following correction to your schematic diagram:

Change the value of the following resistors from 1,000 ohms to 10,000 ohms.
R18, R19, R40, R41

Looking at the factory diagram, there is more space between "1" and "K" on those parts than the other 1K resistors in the amp (like R8.) This suggests an inadvertently dropped "0" from the schematic vs. some sort of production change, but that's another possibility. Possibly differences in the meters. IIRC some also had 10R vs 3R3 cathode resistors - perhaps also related to a meter changeover.

I've also seen differences in some of the small pf caps on my citation v vs. others on the web. I think the Sams schematic reflects those alternates though.
 
Last edited: