Swapping Op-Amps... you have checked to see it's stable haven't you ?


Paid Member
2007-09-15 8:14 am
The subject of swapping op-amps is one of the more frequent topics to crop up on these forums... and regulars will know that I often add a proviso that you should ALWAYS check that the replacement is at the very least stable. Never assume it will be.

So here just to show what I mean is a simple op-amp swap of the sort that crops up on diyAudio all the time.

The circuit shown was designed for the NE5534 with no external compensation used on the op-amp. A typical scenario then, where everyone has their own ideas and favourites on what to fit. What could possibly go wrong... a double sided PCB with large ground planes with extensive decoupling and local regulators it is a model of impeccable layout.

The opamp we are replacing is U30 that sums the output of the DAC. The two scope traces show the substituted op-amp as the top trace and the original as the lower trace. The scope was on the output of U30

The first picture is of the OPA604 FET opamp, one of my personal favourites. Straight away it is obvious that something is not right... the trace is "thicker", a classic effect of very high frequency instability. This was playing a 1khz track at around -40 db. The frequency of oscillation was around 1.8 Mhz and around 0.6 volts peak to peak.

Second shot is the AD797 op-amp. Here the track played is 1 khz at 0db. As can be seen the op-amp is oscillating like crazy. To see just how crazy look at the next shot.

Third shot is the player in stop mode leaving just the oscillation. It's around 1.4Mhz but at a whopping 6 volts peak to peak.

Fourth shot is the output of the op-amp with a 5pf cap across R33... clean with just a small amount of HF hash from the DAC itself that the following stage (the low pass filter) removes.

Would you know it was unstable by listening ? Well actually, you may not, and may put the change in sound down to the op-amp ! The AD797 certainly sounded over bright and thin but I can imagine some saying, "hey listen to that extra detail" it just shows how murky and dull the 5534 was. A bit extreme maybe, but you see my point.

The OPA604... far more subtle and many wouldn't notice the problem in a lot of systems.

So I hope that helps explain the "always check for stabilty etc" that I always trot out, and some of you reading this are probably doing so because I just linked your thread on "what should I replace xxxxxx with" to this one ;)

Happy swapping...


  • 1. OPA604 (800x600).jpg
    1. OPA604 (800x600).jpg
    270.1 KB · Views: 5,204
  • 2. AD797 (800x600).jpg
    2. AD797 (800x600).jpg
    271.6 KB · Views: 4,905
  • 3. AD797 Oscillation (800x600).jpg
    3. AD797 Oscillation (800x600).jpg
    272.2 KB · Views: 4,816
  • 4. Correctly compensated (800x600).jpg
    4. Correctly compensated (800x600).jpg
    258.8 KB · Views: 4,803
  • DAC opamp application.JPG
    DAC opamp application.JPG
    104.3 KB · Views: 4,981
OP amps should always be in band limited ciruits.
Best way is to have a capacitor in the feedback loop.
Only if its unity gain stable!
Don't forget the series output resistor if there is a capacitive load.

I also do not like the swappers habit of using IC sockets and stacked DIL-SMD converters. Video op-amps, which a lot of the > 10 MHz parts are, do not like the extra power supply inductance
[snip]Best way is to have a capacitor in the feedback loop.

Be careful! If you have an opamp or circuit that is not unity-gain stable, that cap will surely make it sing!
Such a feedback loop cap should only be used if you really know your circuit, like if you want to correct some phase shift elsewhere and not cause oscillations by decreasing the closed loop gain.

jan didden


Paid Member
2003-07-25 10:44 pm
Here are some guidelines from another post. Do just ONE of these things and you are likely to have problems. As noted above, the faster the op-amp, the more careful you need to be.

Happy 'op-amping'!

1. run a non-unity gain stable opamp at unity gain
2. run a decompensated opamp without a comp cap, or too small a comp cap for the gain setting
3. fail to fit an isolation resistor (usually about 50 Ohms) in series with the output when driving a real world load - like a cable for example, or a capacitive load.
4. fail to ensure that the junction of the feedback network is located physically very close to the op-amp feedback input pin (usually the inverting input)
5. fail to locate the input filter as physically close as possible to the op-amp input (usually the non-inverting input)
6. fail to decouple the supply rails adequately and close to the opamp supply pins
7. you use an opamp not characterized for wide band audio usage that has an inadequate slew rate
8. Fitting the comp cap across the wrong pins in an uncomensated op-amp (i.e 1-5 instead of 1-8 and vice-a-versa)
9. Failing to scope your physical design out . . . always follow Mooly's example
Get a scope. Seriously. Why in the world would someone try to do electronics without the basic tools? May as well try to get by without a soldering iron.
I don't like being brow-beaten (esp. by a moderator!) into spending $150-200 minimum on a tool that might get used once a year. Seriously. Is that unreasonable?

(One of NP's early articles, A40, even has a suggestion on how to check DC at the outputs for the DIYer who HAS NO volt meter....!)