Yeah, I should wear my glasses when I look at graphs now.Looks like F6 at 50Hz in TABAQ to me?
F3 more like 55~58Hz.
That's why I liked LATL, the graphs were more spaced out and easier to read. I need to find how to spread the frequency axis in HornResp.
Updated with the standard HP35 BR ports which I have here on stock.
Also reuse my very robust stands from a previous project 😀 .
Edit: I like the over-kill 🤣 👍.
Also reuse my very robust stands from a previous project 😀 .
Edit: I like the over-kill 🤣 👍.
Attachments
Last edited:
Damn you! I just finished cleaning up the workshop today and you gave me another idea to build a speaker. Those mini-towers look lovely.
I just have 1 question: when building line-arrays or anything with more than 1 speaker, doesn't the resistance increase dramatically, which in turn needs a much more powerful amp to produce the same level of sound pressure/volume? Or does the resistance and the needed wattage increase slower than the gain of volume due to more drivers?
In other words: For example if I had the EX-214 which offers 2x 70W at 4 ohm or 2x 45W at 8 ohm, wouldn't my amp struggle to produce "good" sound levels?
https://www.bc-acoustique.com/en/el...ntegrated-amplifier-2x45w-wireless-369-detail
In any “array” of same drivers, how you wire them determines the end impedance. That and the amplfier determine power output.
Everytime you double the number of drivers the efficiency increases by 3dB. Sensitivity depends on how yo wire them.
If you have a set of drivers that are the square of something (ie 4, 9, 16, 25, 36… one can series/parallel and end up with the same nonimal impedance as a single driver.
dave
Everytime you double the number of drivers the efficiency increases by 3dB. Sensitivity depends on how yo wire them.
If you have a set of drivers that are the square of something (ie 4, 9, 16, 25, 36… one can series/parallel and end up with the same nonimal impedance as a single driver.
dave
