I have a few questions for Nelson regarding the impressive looking SR1 if I can be so bold.Having read the manual for the SR1 I see you used a fully active version as a reference when developing the passive version.As a proponent of active systems myself I was curious as to how close in performance you were able to come with the passive version vs the reference?
Aswell what crossover slopes and frequencies were used for both systems.
(I'm aware this may be propretary info and so understand completely if you don't care to divulge details.)
Thanks.
Aswell what crossover slopes and frequencies were used for both systems.
(I'm aware this may be propretary info and so understand completely if you don't care to divulge details.)
Thanks.