Squaker?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The terms were Woofer, Squawker, Tweeter, american I believe.

I believe Sqawker fell into non-use because its simply not
as good a name for the relevant unit as the other two.

Though it is pretty apt for the "midrange" in many a cheap
speaker, which in reality are usually overgrown tweeters.

Considering this perhaps its also because it has derogatory
connotations that advertising copywriters stopped using it.

🙂 sreten.
 
Another american term fallen by the wayside is referring
to the treble part of a twin cone as a "whizzer".

the animal origins of the other terms are obvious,
this one for its origin has me stumped.
(All I can think of is the paper rolled up tube childrens toy)


And to disagree with HDTVman the term "squawker" which
seemed to be used only in american product descriptions
was a source of some amusement to us Brits.
I assure you it was fairly common in american loudspeaker
descriptions lifted into the "UK hifi yearbook" of days gone old.

🙂 sreten.
 
I am so glad to hear squawker again.

I am in favour of the three animal system. Can't really be sure why it fell out of favour. When I was but a wee lad it was woofer, squawker, tweeter. In fact midrange sounded kind of weird back then but soon became popular. And now?... no squawker

But alas, the evolution of a language.

Cal

Hey sreten, I guess I better catch up. What is a whizzer called now?
 
'Squawker' was also used by Phillips many years ago for their midranges. Now a days the word squawk has a really rough sounding connotation to it. 'He squawked like a chicken' come to mind. Would you want to listen to something that squawked?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.