SPL limit for 2 way or 3way single point loudspeakers question

Guys,

this is a question that i had since many many years back, but it was until today that i dare to ask

so, why most of the mid grade ( QSC KW series , EV ETX, JBL SRX 800's ) V2 way or 3way PA cabinets
max SPL ratings are around 135 or 136 dB's

is because the limits of physics or because the limits of the drivers for that given price ( max 2k )
as far as i know the HF driver is padded because it have much better sensitivity that then LF driver
so the LF cant cope with the HF power limit and that is why manufacturers can only achieve around 135SPL's

i saw the new MEYER Panther series that are rated at around 150dB's SPL but those are linear cabinets and i think they cost above 8k each
but what about the 2 way single point PA loudspeakers
 
Yeah that is the limit of the current LF driver technology and in fact even that is stretching the truth a bit... only the best of them can produce a continuous average of more than 130dB. To do better than that requires multiple LF drivers or horn loading.
 
so that means that on a single point loudspeaker we can only have one on each side..maybe 2 ..top of each other config (horns next to each other stacked vertically) and thats it ... if we want more spl at the dance floor we need to go with line array cabinets as the single point do not sum well in clusters cause the hf lens be too wide and cause all sorts of nasty cancellations and comb filtering. as of now i think a pair of etx10's per side will give the most bang for the buck(cabinets below 1.5k) i have seen them at 1k open box, they use FIR processing from their DC one processor according to the specs posted online. i have heard the Kw series and the etx side to side and the etx sound clearer and louder when pushthem towards limiting, to me qsc is overpriced but to each its own, this is just my personal point of view according to my subjective on the field perception.
 
I own or have used most of the current EV powered speaker lineup including the ETX series.
so that means that on a single point loudspeaker we can only have one on each side..maybe 2 ..top of each other config (horns next to each other stacked vertically) and thats it ... if we want more spl at the dance floor we need to go with line array cabinets as the single point do not sum well in clusters cause the hf lens be too wide and cause all sorts of nasty cancellations and comb filtering.
Yes and no. There are a few 3-way powered boxes that tend to be the loudest in thier lineup and there are a few non standard designs with multiple low/mids in either an MTM or MMT arrangement, look for the Ingenia iG4t and RCF NX series. But also note that comb filtering is exactly what makes a line array behave the way it does and in comparison a couple of point source splayed boxes side by side is pretty smooth... and you may need that to get decent coverage anyway so it's probably not something to get too concerned with.
as of now i think a pair of etx10's per side will give the most bang for the buck(cabinets below 1.5k) i have seen them at 1k open box, they use FIR processing from their DC one processor according to the specs posted online. i have heard the Kw series and the etx side to side and the etx sound clearer and louder when pushthem towards limiting, to me qsc is overpriced but to each its own, this is just my personal point of view according to my subjective on the field perception.
I have used most of the new EV powered boxes including the ETX and yes they are very good IMO. The original K series is badly outclassed by most modern powered speaker offerings, they did tend to get rather harsh when pushed while none of the newer powerered boxes I have used display this trait.. they just indicate limiting and stop getting any louder.
 
so that means that on a single point loudspeaker we can only have one on each side..maybe 2 ..top of each other config (horns next to each other stacked vertically) and thats it ... if we want more spl at the dance floor we need to go with line array cabinets as the single point do not sum well in clusters cause the hf lens be too wide and cause all sorts of nasty cancellations and comb filtering.
I disagree there are several alternatives to line arrays:
1) high frequency combiners (see danley Jerico series)
2) dividing the frequency range more (many very high SPL point sources are stacks of speakers 3/4/5 way). See Void Incubus (also uses array HF).
3) various clustering techniques, the more narrow each speakers dispersion the louder it will typicaly be due to radiating into a smaller solid angle. In a cluster the woofers will mutualy couple increasing midbass SPL capability. If the system/speaker is designed well the response anomolies due to clustering are not too bad.

Check out this JBL HLA cluster:
1663282001741.png


In fact would it suprise you that some of the largest gigs of all time did not use line arrays I have attached the info I have on the community airforce system which I have been told did 100k people with no delays.
 

Attachments

  • 120195976_653052815639256_2016135544271539684_n.jpg
    120195976_653052815639256_2016135544271539684_n.jpg
    53.4 KB · Views: 95
  • 120362301_653052775639260_1310032848506877836_n.jpg
    120362301_653052775639260_1310032848506877836_n.jpg
    83.6 KB · Views: 82
  • 120443042_653052902305914_7673010185519577932_n.jpg
    120443042_653052902305914_7673010185519577932_n.jpg
    58.8 KB · Views: 88
  • 120451817_653052948972576_5931008353202649085_n.jpg
    120451817_653052948972576_5931008353202649085_n.jpg
    61.3 KB · Views: 92
  • 120451997_653052985639239_9007270836166849088_n.jpg
    120451997_653052985639239_9007270836166849088_n.jpg
    75.5 KB · Views: 92
  • 120453199_653052712305933_4093263155905260285_n.jpg
    120453199_653052712305933_4093263155905260285_n.jpg
    51.1 KB · Views: 87
  • 120455777_653052858972585_2230850238548615038_n.jpg
    120455777_653052858972585_2230850238548615038_n.jpg
    47.4 KB · Views: 87
  • 120485999_653052738972597_3952242462293773163_n.jpg
    120485999_653052738972597_3952242462293773163_n.jpg
    44.2 KB · Views: 90
Theres a bit more info on the airforce on the 'speaker freakers' facebook page and this booklet with loads of info:
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/6466821/large-scale-sound-reinforcement-community-airforce
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lx_5X_Fl_ywglkUHQINQnu-YaTaU-4Ws/view?usp=sharing (as I hate broken links and suspect that yumpu thing will go down at some point)

from speaker freakers comments:
Actualy 120k people, AF1 box was never made due to HF requirment been not posible at the time, Two airforce systems where produced (not a sucessfull product) and one was for sale in UK during 2020.

Community light and sound is now owned by Biamp and they still make high SPL point source boxes however nothing of the scale of the airforce system. I terms of amps big amps of the era would have been stuff like the Crown MA5000VZ, Crest 9001 etc. Very heavy and high power consumption compared to modern amplifiers. Big systems sometimes reached the maximum current they could pull from the generator and maximum truck weight before they where limited by the drive units power handling.

There is actauly a standard based on MNOISE for max SPL in progress/recently completed:
https://m-noise.org/
 
Lambda labs also do a high power point source cluster system:
https://www.lambda-labs.com/en/products/qx-3
it gets out quite a bit judging from lambda labs FB page so I'm suprised their website hasn't more info.

"I'm working with a very similar concept system now, one that has solved the HF problem (16 1" drivers and 32 2" drivers in one box)" I assume thats cramed into the top horn somehow which is quite mad!
 

Attachments

  • 116718371_10223469943636295_6807941841142237733_n.jpg
    116718371_10223469943636295_6807941841142237733_n.jpg
    89 KB · Views: 112
Ohh ! super nice info there Kipman
Thanks for sharing mate.

and the lambda speakers are unbelievable , example is the 18" Sub horn
"Rigid braced construction of special 15mm lightweight-wood" only 138lbs !!!
i bet they cost 8k+
1663632122244.png
 
Last edited:
True, but with dynamic mics often struggling above 10kHz and below 50Hz (requiring large compensations and, in the HF, finnicky positioning), I'd opt for a large-diaphragm condenser. It's often possible to rent those from nearby studios, and the good ones will take >150dB without complaining.

Chris
 
Lambda labs also do a high power point source cluster system:
https://www.lambda-labs.com/en/products/qx-3
it gets out quite a bit judging from lambda labs FB page so I'm suprised their website hasn't more info.

"I'm working with a very similar concept system now, one that has solved the HF problem (16 1" drivers and 32 2" drivers in one box)" I assume thats cramed into the top horn somehow which is quite mad!
It’s essentially a Unity Horn arrangement for the 1” and 2” elements.