No. You disagree with me (and physics).BesPav said:The nonlinearity are caused by wire resistance.
You now agree with me (and physics). So what do you think? You can't agree with something and its exact opposite.Of course - no.
No. It is the nonlinearity of the speaker impedance which is being measured. Nonlinearity causes distortion.Nonlinearity of speaker impedance doesn’t cause signal distortion. It can cause phase lag, it can cause huge current, but not distortion.
This is precisely what I have been trying to teach you.Our measurement setup sees part of voltage drop, being caused by that current at wire resistance (or being divided at load voltage) as distortion.
No. Distortion is created by nonlinearity (in the speaker). This distortion is then rendered visible by resistance in the circuit (which will also affect the damping too). Poor damping does not cause nonlinearity and so cannot cause nonlinearity.Distortion was caused by bad damping.
Cable capacitance and inductance is small (for speaker cables) and fairly linear, so not a source of distortion.xrk971 said:Pure conducting ideal wires are different than real cables which have intrinsic parasitic capacitance and inductance.
Good joints are linear, otherwise most modern technology could not work.They also have metal to metal terminations of dissimilar metals and joints etc. I don’t think all of these system effects are linear.
You seem to want to believe that cables cause distortion. Why? Science says no. Technology says no. Careful measurements say no. Why choose to believe the opposite of the truth?
I think that you can’t stop trolling me.So what do you think?
All have already understand, but you’re continue to argue.
Ok, for the sake of clarity would you confim that you now understand that the observed distortion was caused by speaker nonlinearity and that the cable resistance merely makes this visible - the cable itself being linear.
Yes.the cable itself being linear.
Read carefully. The observed distortion was caused by interacting between speaker nonlinearity and cable resistance, while latter also makes this visible.the observed distortion was caused by speaker nonlinearity and that the cable resistance merely makes this visible
There is a good reason for which at high displacements of the voice coil, this can be true. Many tests have shown that some drivers distort less when current driven (with the drawback that electrical damping is lost and the frequency response needs compensation) and other drivers distort less when voltage driven. If somebody thinks of current driving, he must first check the distortion on each mode.There are people who advocate going to the opposite extreme: current driving of speakers. Their logic is that it is current which moves the voice coil, so if the current is set by the amplifier (instead of the voltage) then the result will be more transducer linearity.
On large displacements, the B of the Bl decreases. Then the back-EMF falls, the impedance decreases. In voltage driven mode, there is more current in the voice coil and the moving force tends to push it outside of the gap. Albeit rarely discussed, this effect is known since long, it is called driver instability. Avoiding it is the main advantage of driver current driving.I am not convinced that they are right. Speaker nonlinearity has various causes but there is no a priori reason to assume that current drive is better. For one cause of nonlinearity (voice coil displacement in a non-uniform magnetic field) I think voltage drive is better: as the voice coil moves out of the gap it will generate less force but also less back emf so with a conventional system the current will increase to partly compensate; a current-driven system cannot compensate. Suspension nonlinearity could act in the same way: if anything tends to restrict the motion this will increase the current in a conventional system, but not a current-driven system.
You see above that how physics can be subtle. Note that some great names have investigated driver behavior in current mode.That is one of the beauties of audio: whatever the physics says, there are always people who take the opposite view.
The results are rather interesting.
- Distortion increase is significantly more noticeable at 1KHz than it is at 20KHz;
- Harmonic that grows the most is H3 (H2 even goes down in some cases);
- The effect is much less noticeable with low-feedback amplifier than it is with "normal" - high-feedback - amplifier. Distortion at 20KHz even goes down with longer cable as soon as the feedback loop gain is low (18db in my case).
Hi Valeriy,
I was not courageous enough to read the whole thread but let me bring my 12 cents:
- I hope you are measuring with a differential input connected to the load to avoid especially signal return wire influence,
- in case of considerable impedance of the wires that go to the load, they may decrease damping factor of the amplifier and then distortion rises, because speaker non-linearity, reflected as non-linear speaker current, is more affecting the resulting distortion, please see
Current drive of speakers and speaker distortion
Cables itself have no distortion, it is all about conditions in the complete circuit.
Similar thing happens if you connect headphones to headphone amplifier with higher output impedance, like 50 ohm vs. amp with something like 1 ohm output impedance. You will measure higher distortion in case of the 50 ohm output, because headphone driver non-linear current results in higher voltage distortion across higher impedance. In case of lower output impedance the damping is better and measured voltage distortion is lower.
Last edited:
I was not courageous enough to read the whole thread
Hi Pavel,
Those were the "strange" results we started at. Later on, I have identified the problem with the analyzer's input connection - described here:
Correct measurements at the far end of the cable
Finally, I ran a series of tests with the real speaker at the low frequencies, demonstrating non-linearity of the speaker impedance and the fact that the cable with higher Z allows more noticeable distortion at the speaker end (which is practically a divider exercise):
Real speaker spectrums measurement
These measurements are actually in line with the ones presented in your article.
Cheers,
Valery
I would like to propose that, if it were possible, someone would measure a system of this type:
6moons audioreviews: Mr. Fussball’s budget system
The amplifier has no feedback, so there is no influence out there, and the speakers are full-range without crossovers, there's no influence out there either.
But the secondary of the output transformer, connected directly to the speaker coil forms a balanced system, and that's the interesting part. Does this reduce the noise and distortion in relation to a 'normal' connection (feedback + crossovers) or does it have no influence? If it produces any improvement this would be a very interesting type of system.
Thanks in advance
6moons audioreviews: Mr. Fussball’s budget system
The amplifier has no feedback, so there is no influence out there, and the speakers are full-range without crossovers, there's no influence out there either.
But the secondary of the output transformer, connected directly to the speaker coil forms a balanced system, and that's the interesting part. Does this reduce the noise and distortion in relation to a 'normal' connection (feedback + crossovers) or does it have no influence? If it produces any improvement this would be a very interesting type of system.
Thanks in advance
All amps have feedback. And all speakers are driven balanced. If you grounded one side of the output transformer it would still be balanced. You would need to ground the negative speaker terminal to a 3rd pin power ground to unbalance it.
Last edited:
I think that you can’t stop trolling me.
All have already understand, but you’re continue to argue.
You mean stop educating you. Your posts are confusing and contradictory.
Thank you, i’d not needed, actually doesn’t need and, i’m suppose, will not need such a teacher.You mean stop educating you.
Not one of you, dear teachers, doesn’t ask Valery WHAT, WHERE and HOW he need to measure.Your posts are confusing and contradictory.
So shut up and stay away, as GB minister of defense says.
No. You still seem to be asserting that the cable, which you admit is linear, has a part to play in causing the distortion. You are arguing against yourself.BesPav said:Read carefully. The observed distortion was caused by interacting between speaker nonlinearity and cable resistance, while latter also makes this visible.
Thanks for your explanations.forr said:You see above that how physics can be subtle. Note that some great names have investigated driver behavior in current mode.
Please keep politics out of this.BesPav said:So shut up and stay away, as GB minister of defense says.
Yes, you’re clearly right now.the cable, which you admit is linear, has a part to play in causing the distortion.
Cable is linear and it’s a single reason to distortion. It’s resistance hinders secondary current from driver’s coil to be shorted/dumped by/to the low output resistanse of the amplifier.
While speaker is connected to the amp without long/resistive cable there are no distortion.
Open your eyes, exactly cable resistanse being linear nevertheless simultaneously causes distortion and makes it’s visible.
Boring now, thank you for our conversation.
Thanks for exhibiting your confusion so clearly: 'Linear circuit element causes distortion'.BesPav said:Open your eyes, exactly cable resistanse being linear nevertheless simultaneously causes distortion and makes it’s visible.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Speaker cables don't influence harmonic distortion!