I have been considering that before I have chosen this solution. The main reason was that this shown here gave smoother distortion residual at high frequencies. Self's type II bias gives a bit lower distortion, but more high order components. That's the main reason why I made it this way (type I by Self).
Thanks Pavel... that's interesting, I haven't the means to measure distortion like that.
I am, well describe why it is important not noise, but the gain at high frequencies. I explained why the high current input circuits. I explained why no local feedback. PMA well studied my text.
Distortion is not the smallest, but listening is better than ever, congratulations.
Distortion is not the smallest, but listening is better than ever, congratulations.
… can use higher rail voltage ….. If you don't understand what I'm talking, ...
Thank you for repeating what I've written many times on their website.
And no local feedback at PMA's schematic, Federmann ? Really ?
In effect, all killing capacity, why are you asking when you read my site.
Thank you for repeating what I've written many times on their website.
Pavel Dudek made higher VAS rails in his amplifiers 17 years ago.
Also with bjt followers you can to use higher rail voltage at VAS, here concrete 2xVbe higher, if you can to go at full efficiency of output stage...
That's right.
I use an amp, almost exactly like this, as my principal amp in my video system. It works well for this application!
for the application here or for the application in your video system?
here was describt audible effects. By your video system are only to observe visual effects - so I think.What is the difference between HERE and my video system?
You wrote
"It works well for this application!" Therefore my question. What means "this"
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Solid Solid State Power Amplifier