Snuggles

This headphone amplifier is based on the Tori amplifier, which name seems to come from an agressive dog.
I hope to have tamed that dog, hence the name 'Snuggles', Simulating the amplifier in LTspice was not easy for me to get right. I probably should have called this amp 'Struggles' instead of 'Snuggles'.
Anyway, I am planning to build it using a NE5532 or similar, but what do you think? Does it have a chance of success?
Snuggles.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mooly
It looks workable 🙂

Not sure R3 does much tbh and R1 (and using a resistor is fine) could perhaps be improved with a simple transistor current sink instead. As the amp is AC coupled the DC balance is not so important but would be an issue if you converted it to a dual rail supply.
 
Hi Mooly, thanks for your quick reply.
R3 actually did the trick to make it work in LTSpice, but like you I am not sure why it is needed. I will not be surprised if it will just work without it, like the original Tori amp did.
My space here is limited and I only have a single rail supply. That is why I made it AC coupled. Apart from I do not hear the difference anyway 🙂
 
That sim is not behaving as expected...

Try an LT1056A opamp (it is like a TL072) and a 2N2222 model for the transistor. Add a cap in the feedback return.

R1 is not allowing enough current into the load on negative half cycles. Reduce the value or add a current sink.
 

Attachments

Two bones in one, stabilizing the emitter current by replacing the 50 ohm resistor and sharing the load over two transistors instead of one 👍
Now Snuggles is able to fetch the current I want to hear the result, burning a hole or not 🙂
 
Ok, I will keep that in mind. The values you choose I expect the volume to be sufficient, using the 80 ohm headphones that I have.
First I will build something, diy style. I am very curious how it will sound.
 
Last edited:
The harmonics this causes may sound interesting and if so I will make that 'shortcut' switchable, if it does not cause oscillation.

That's a good idea. I can't see any stability issues with a design like this.

You can also use an LED for the current sink which saves a transistor. Resistor value depends on the LED colour (different colours have different forward volt drops)

If you make the signal caps '1' in the sim (1 Farad) it effectively takes the time constants out of the sim and you will see a more accurate FFT.

Screenshot 2024-04-06 062903.png
 
You can also use an LED for the current sink which saves a transistor. Resistor value depends on the LED colour (different colours have different forward volt drops)
Which is also a good idea!
If you make the signal caps '1' in the sim (1 Farad) it effectively takes the time constants out of the sim and you will see a more accurate FFT.
And I thought the .asc file was corrupted 🙂 I learn a lot Mooly!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mooly
Finally, after some virtual experimentation I decided I will build the following circuit, output transistor switchable inside and outside the feedback loop, using a LM317 as a constant current source.
I expect the switch between Q1 inside and outside the feedback loop to be interesting, soundwise.

Q1 outside the feedback loop:
Snuggles out feedback loop.png


Q1 inside the feedback loop:
Snuggles in feedback loop.png
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: Mooly
Would only add that C7 at the input really needs a resistor adding in series with the input to define the response. As it is now it just adds a cap across whatever the input source is and that is not ideal. Try a 2k2.
 
Hi Mooly,

Previously in an other circuit I noticed that just using C7 solved a problem with a crackly volume pot, appearently caused by DC. That is why I added it as a precaution. But I will keep your suggestion in mind of course, thanks.