sorry I don't know the meaning of PAX Rack.
PA means Pulseaudio i think.
PA also works with Jack or let say route to jack (pulseaudio-module-jack).
PA means Pulseaudio i think.
PA also works with Jack or let say route to jack (pulseaudio-module-jack).
please add
to your /etc/pulse/default.pa file. maybe you should comment out the line containing
but I don't know atm.
As you're modifying system files you a) need to be root to do that (or use sudo) and b) MAKE A BACKUP BEFOREHAND! 😀
Code:
load-module module-alsa-sink device="multidev"
Code:
load-module module-udev-detect
As you're modifying system files you a) need to be root to do that (or use sudo) and b) MAKE A BACKUP BEFOREHAND! 😀
I tried all this and none worked;
1. Added the first line and commented out all of the lines incorporating the second
2. Commented out only the second line and left the rest of the if statement
3, Did not comment out the second and added the first.
I then commented out the first and PAX Rack again showed the two sound cards but not the virtual device.
1. Added the first line and commented out all of the lines incorporating the second
2. Commented out only the second line and left the rest of the if statement
3, Did not comment out the second and added the first.
I then commented out the first and PAX Rack again showed the two sound cards but not the virtual device.
I tried all this and none worked;
1. Added the first line and commented out all of the lines incorporating the second
2. Commented out only the second line and left the rest of the if statement
3, Did not comment out the second and added the first.
I then commented out the first and PAX Rack again showed the two sound cards but not the virtual device.
1. please remove $HOME/.config/pulse/default.pa if it exists to make sure the system file is read.
2. You do realize that you have to restart pulseaudio after changing default.pa?!
I really recommend to check the setup with
In my testing case I did not see the PCM device name in GUI, just an extra "Stereo device" or something like it appeared in the output devices list. It was not shown as selected (i.e. active) until running the command
However, all the detailed info was listed in pacmd dump, including proper name of the PCM device.
Code:
pacmd dump
In my testing case I did not see the PCM device name in GUI, just an extra "Stereo device" or something like it appeared in the output devices list. It was not shown as selected (i.e. active) until running the command
Code:
pacmd set-default-sink alsa_output.multidev
However, all the detailed info was listed in pacmd dump, including proper name of the PCM device.
Did you check it shows up in the output selection dropdown of pulseaudio crossover rack? maybe I will have to adjust the code there that reads back the available output sinks...
No.Did you check it shows up in the output selection dropdown of pulseaudio crossover rack? maybe I will have to adjust the code there that reads back the available output sinks...
Oops, I realised after about 10 minutes after posting. It doesn't show up in the dropdown box."No - You didn't check" or "No - it doesn't show up?" 😀
Do you know, in Windows is possible this? Using multiple USB soundcards?
I design usb scopes and LC meters.
Each device has a VID and PID and if two devices have the same ones then they will clash.
There may be a way around it, I am not sure.
Either way the USB devices needs to know which one the data is for.
Each device has a VID and PID and if two devices have the same ones then they will clash.
VID and PID are info for the USB core driver to load the correct higher-level device driver. The USB core driver uses bus -> port -> dev IDs for identifying the devices:
Code:
hestia@hestia:~$ lsusb -t
/: Bus 08.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=uhci_hcd/2p, 12M
/: Bus 07.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=uhci_hcd/2p, 12M
/: Bus 06.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=uhci_hcd/2p, 12M
/: Bus 05.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=uhci_hcd/2p, 12M
/: Bus 04.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=uhci_hcd/2p, 12M
/: Bus 03.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=uhci_hcd/2p, 12M
|__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Human Interface Device, Driver=usbhid, 1.5M
/: Bus 02.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=ehci-pci/6p, 480M
|__ Port 6: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/4p, 480M
|__ Port 4: Dev 3, If 0, Class=Human Interface Device, Driver=usbhid, 1.5M
|__ Port 4: Dev 3, If 1, Class=Human Interface Device, Driver=usbhid, 1.5M
/: Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=ehci-pci/6p, 480M
If windows USB driver stack could not distinguish two devices with identical VID/PID, it would be a very bad design. Hooking several identical keyboards/mice/USB hubs etc. would not work.
In linux device names are used while it is possible to assign fixed distinct names to identical devices in different USB ports via those udev rules. Is anything like that available in windows?
Last edited:
Oops, I realised after about 10 minutes after posting. It doesn't show up in the dropdown box.
can you please post the output of "pactl list sinks", preferrably to a pastebin... with the combined soundcard active in pulseaudio of course.
Please do not forget to run
first to load the PCM device into pulseaudio. By default PA loads sound cards only, not the additional PCM devices created by alsa configs.
Code:
pactl load-module module-alsa-sink device="multidev"
first to load the PCM device into pulseaudio. By default PA loads sound cards only, not the additional PCM devices created by alsa configs.
Please do not forget to run
Code:pactl load-module module-alsa-sink device="multidev"
first to load the PCM device into pulseaudio. By default PA loads sound cards only, not the additional PCM devices created by alsa configs.
...or put the load-module line into default.pa...
A minor difference is calling the pactl command directly tells whether loading the device was successful or not. The same problem in config file would have to be identified from PA logs I guess. For testing I would prefer the direct-feedback procedure.
One more thing regarding the GUI - upon loading the sink the new device does not appear in hardware list, but in output selection list. The "pactl list sinks" command lists it too.
One more thing regarding the GUI - upon loading the sink the new device does not appear in hardware list, but in output selection list. The "pactl list sinks" command lists it too.
I guess output selection means in the config dialog for outputs in PaXoverRack. What do you mean by hardware list?
My .asoundrc defines virtual balanced inputs/outputs device called symmetric:
Mint Hardware tab = Configuration tab in pavucontrol - the device is not listed there (probably because it requires no configuration). It is listed in Outputs tab in both GUI tools. I have not tried PaXoverRack.
Code:
hestia@hestia:~$ pactl load-module module-alsa-sink device="symmetric"
21
Mint Hardware tab = Configuration tab in pavucontrol - the device is not listed there (probably because it requires no configuration). It is listed in Outputs tab in both GUI tools. I have not tried PaXoverRack.
This should be trivial to achieve with brutefir, but you will never have the exact same timing between the two devices - they will always drift. I cannot imagine getting very good stereo imaging with this sort of setup.
- Home
- Source & Line
- PC Based
- Single PC solution - Use of 2 USB sound cards as crossovers using PAX Rack