Yes, for the manufacturers of high end cables in particular!. . . things continue to get better all the time.
My policy is not to watch these videos. Visitor counts lend them credibility. I am grateful for the summaries of errors which some of you post here, so I know I haven't missed anything of any importance.jneutron said:I assume you're getting credits for having idiots like me link to the video, right?
I do sometimes read silly web pages. Maybe this is because I find it easier to pick out a written sentence and show the untruth in it.
The people promoting all this nonsense seem quite oblivious to how ridiculous they look to those who actually listened during their electricity lessons in school. They seem to have learnt the words, but the meanings have passed them by.
Directionality could result from some substance coupling (and being modified by) some product of electric and magnetic fields (such as multiferroics?). Such substances are not usually part of audio interconnects; in fact it could be quite hard to make a detectably directional analogue audio cable even if we wanted to, so making one accidentally is quite unlikely.
Only if the “substance coupling” is nonlinear or time dependent. Otherwise, the cable will still be non directional.
For the rest, I agree.
Comedy gold.In this video a good friend of mine asks the question "why can't we measure the differences that we hear in cables?" to the head of Wireworld cables. Start at 19:00. David does answer the question.
YouTube
Some weapons grade BS on the audioquest power products pages
Every conceivable detail has been addressed: In the Niagara 5000, you’ll find optimized radio-frequency lead directionality, capacitor run-in forming technologies developed by Jet Propulsion Laboratories and NASA, and AC inlet and outlet contacts with heavy silver plating over extreme-purity copper, assuring the tightest grip possible
NASA could be an acronym for 'No Actual Science Applies'!developed by . . . NASA
Hello Waly.Only if the “substance coupling” is nonlinear or time dependent. Otherwise, the cable will still be non directional.
I have just run some subjective trials.
I am running 40cm RCA interconnects using el cheapo white plastic plugs and RG59 cable.
Running 2 ch mono source I have very precise centre image with precise depth imaging.
When I swap the direction of one interconnect this all changes....the center image is broadened and the depth image is 'broadened' also.
Moving to listening to preferentially one cabinet or the other reveals a 'polarity' issue.....sort of sounds like one cabinet in correct absolute polarity and the other cabinet in reversed polarity.
Normal or reversed direction of both cables causes the same 'polarity' changes.
I also just tried an experiment I have been 'getting around to' and that is to 'skin' the RG59.
The directional effect is still robustly evident and overall the sound is clearer and more informational.
These Mid/Side and depth informational changes are consistent with my prior experience and as my system progresses these kinds of otherwise subtle characteristics are more clearly revealed...IOW plain as day.
Dan.
Last edited:
I have just run some subjective trials.
I am running 40cm RCA interconnects using el cheapo white plastic plugs and RG59 cable.
Running 2 ch mono source I have very precise centre image with precise depth imaging.
When I swap the direction of one interconnect this all changes....the center image is broadened and the depth image is 'broadened' also.
Moving to listening to preferentially one cabinet or the other reveals a 'polarity' issue.....sort of sounds like one cabinet in correct absolute polarity and the other cabinet in reversed polarity.
Normal or reversed direction of both cables causes the same 'polarity' changes.
I also just tried an experiment I have been 'getting around to' and that is to 'skin' the RG59.
The directional effect is still robustly evident and overall the sound is clearer and more informational.
These Mid/Side and depth informational changes are consistent with my prior experience and as my system progresses these kinds of otherwise subtle characteristics are more clearly revealed...IOW plain as day.
Don’t insist, I’m not buying this kind of BS. At audio frequencies the directionality effect due to the dielectric electric and magnetic nonlinearities is 10-12 orders of magnitude lower that what can be measured in a regular lab. If you think you can hear that, you may want to apply for a job at LIGO, with some training you could potentially hear the gravitational waves before the usual 400dB of parametric gain.
Uh huh.Don�t insist, I�m not buying this kind of BS. At audio frequencies the directionality effect due to the dielectric electric and magnetic nonlinearities is 10-12 orders of magnitude lower that what can be measured in a regular lab. If you think you can hear that, you may want to apply for a job at LIGO, with some training you could potentially hear the gravitational waves before the usual 400dB of parametric gain.
I'm just reporting what I find, tonight I will rerun the experiment by my housemate and his GF.
The cause of the observed subjective directional effects are in the cable or in the 85c RCAs, I vote for the cable.
Dan.
tonight I will rerun the experiment by my housemate and his GF.
Good luck and don’t forget to peek.
Max, thanks for putting up the Hummel download here. I had no idea that it could be had for free these days. Everyone should read Chapter 7 to get up to speed!
It will be blind after training, and the blind test will be to determine which channel is altered.Good luck and don’t forget to peek.
This is not DBT, but who cares.
Dan.
My pleasure and I will read that chapter in detail tonight.Max, thanks for putting up the Hummel download here. I had no idea that it could be had for free these days. Everyone should read Chapter 7 to get up to speed!
Dan.
My policy is not to watch these videos. Visitor counts lend them credibility. I am grateful for the summaries of errors which some of you post here, so I know I haven't missed anything of any importance.
I do sometimes read silly web pages. Maybe this is because I find it easier to pick out a written sentence and show the untruth in it.
The people promoting all this nonsense seem quite oblivious to how ridiculous they look to those who actually listened during their electricity lessons in school. They seem to have learnt the words, but the meanings have passed them by.
I agree.. Life is far to short to listen to loads of ill considered waffle just in case it get to something concrete. At leas a page you can scan in seconds and see if there's hope of sense or not...
I also see we are back to nonsense words for audio description like "glare"...
As I said, if you have something which can respond to the product of electric and magnetic fields then you can have directionality as it is the product which determines energy flow. This will necessarily be nonlinear, as it multiplies two things together, and I guess you could call it time dependent as the multiplier for one field will be the other field and both are varying with time. Nonlinearity alone is insufficient, as that could just produce non directional distortion. You need to sense the direction of energy flow.Waly said:Only if the “substance coupling” is nonlinear or time dependent.
OK well they advertise
BTW that video makes me embarassed to be a brit. I can't listen to 'seven fowzand' more than once. Also the 'its too complex to explain' at least lets you know to hit the stop button.
Have they proven this?Through differential sample tests and spectrum analysis, it can be proven that up to a third of a high-resolution (low-level) audio signal can be lost, masked, or highly distorted by the vast levels of noise riding along the AC power lines that feed our components.
BTW that video makes me embarassed to be a brit. I can't listen to 'seven fowzand' more than once. Also the 'its too complex to explain' at least lets you know to hit the stop button.
Last edited:
Different valves ("tubes" - US) from various manufacturers will add differing distortions as the methods of manufacture may vary, leading to slightly different geometry inside the valve. Just remember - what you're listening to is distorted by the valves, by the audio transformers and by the loudspeakers.
In 40 years of broadcast engineering, I haven't seen any valved amplifier that could anywhere nearly equal the performance of even the cheapest solid state model.
Valves have no place in modern, high quality amplification. The "sound" you like is just even harmonic distortion. The only places they should be used are in guitar amplifiers and high powered TV transmitters!
Artists with unlimited budgets always use tube mics and other valve equip. Thats how they make the big bucks.
Adele is one recent example.
She used a touch of the all tube Pioneer SR-101.
(live and studio)
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- Silver RCA Cable-share your experience, opinions here!