i bet i have more work units completed than
anyone else that frequents these forums 🙂
currently 13,606
anyone else that frequents these forums 🙂
currently 13,606
i used to have a watercooled computer that ran those things like crazy. i also had an office of computers cranking them out. but i quit when i realized it was just using massive amount of power, and accomplishing nothing. 😉
Member
Joined 2002
You got me beat... but i haven't been trying too hard for the last couple years.
Results Received 9788
Total CPU Time 17.889 years
Average CPU Time per work unit 16 hr 00 min 35.4 sec
Average results received per day 7.34
SETI@home user for: 3.652 years
Your rank out of 4276691 total users is: 9314th place.
You have completed more work units than 99.782% of our users.
Still i'm ahead of all but 0.218% of users.
dave
Results Received 9788
Total CPU Time 17.889 years
Average CPU Time per work unit 16 hr 00 min 35.4 sec
Average results received per day 7.34
SETI@home user for: 3.652 years
Your rank out of 4276691 total users is: 9314th place.
You have completed more work units than 99.782% of our users.
Still i'm ahead of all but 0.218% of users.
dave
Caution
I had this on my laptop (compaq M700) at one time.
It caused the thing to come out of "sleep" in it's bag, and by the time I'd got to it, the battery was too hot to touch.
The battery failed immediately afterwards. $£$£$£$£🙁
I had this on my laptop (compaq M700) at one time.
It caused the thing to come out of "sleep" in it's bag, and by the time I'd got to it, the battery was too hot to touch.
The battery failed immediately afterwards. $£$£$£$£🙁
Planet 10... i can tell you've been using MACs to crunch
work units by your average CPU time
: ) just kiding... you're getting close to your 10K milestone!
Are you on a Team? if not i can talk you in to joining my team?
: )
Results Received 13606
Total CPU Time 12.196 years
Average CPU Time per work unit 7 hr 51 min 08.4 sec
Average results received per day 9.83
Last result returned: Sun Mar 2 15:02:55 2003 UTC
Registered on: Wed May 19 04:46:54 1999 UTC
Your rank out of 4277341 total users is: 5430th place.
The number of users who have this rank: 1
You have completed more work units than 99.873% of our users
work units by your average CPU time
: ) just kiding... you're getting close to your 10K milestone!
Are you on a Team? if not i can talk you in to joining my team?
: )
Results Received 13606
Total CPU Time 12.196 years
Average CPU Time per work unit 7 hr 51 min 08.4 sec
Average results received per day 9.83
Last result returned: Sun Mar 2 15:02:55 2003 UTC
Registered on: Wed May 19 04:46:54 1999 UTC
Your rank out of 4277341 total users is: 5430th place.
The number of users who have this rank: 1
You have completed more work units than 99.873% of our users
moe29 said:i can tell you've been using MACs to crunch
work units by your average CPU time
Are you on a Team? if not i can talk you in to joining my team?
Time on my newest Mac is about 4 hours per unit (i bought the slowest cheapest one). The averaged time is spread across many machines over a long time frame at many different speeds... it isn't about speed, it is about finding signals from other intelligent species.
I am on Team Mac Observer.
dave
Member
Joined 2002
you should send me a used old burner. I LOST Alll my data this weekend to STUPID norton system utilities. : O ( sniff sniff.
JasonL said:
I have never experienced data loss while using Norton -- how did you do it?
The only spare burner i have kicking around is an old 2x SCSI that needs a caddy (and i'm not sure if i have one).
dave
Member
Joined 2002
norton speed disk is what i was useing. my drive was slowing down majorly. so i installed it and updated it. then couldent use it because it had major errors on the drive it could not fix. then i rebooted and all my dada was gondie. It is a good think that i back up my email files ever week. onto my firewire little 6gig vst drive. : O )
Hi
Here are my "result", not much compared to yours.
Results Received 1623
Total CPU Time 2.728 years
Average CPU Time per work unit 14 hr 43 min 36.0 sec
Average results received per day 1.92
Last result returned: Mon Mar 3 16:50:25 2003 UTC
Registered on: Wed Nov 8 22:40:44 2000 UTC
SETI@home user for: 2.315 years
Your rank out of 4277499 total users is: 98710th place.
The number of users who have this rank: 66
You have completed more work units than 97.691% of our users.
Keld
Here are my "result", not much compared to yours.
Results Received 1623
Total CPU Time 2.728 years
Average CPU Time per work unit 14 hr 43 min 36.0 sec
Average results received per day 1.92
Last result returned: Mon Mar 3 16:50:25 2003 UTC
Registered on: Wed Nov 8 22:40:44 2000 UTC
SETI@home user for: 2.315 years
Your rank out of 4277499 total users is: 98710th place.
The number of users who have this rank: 66
You have completed more work units than 97.691% of our users.
Keld
This one time a few years ago, I had SETI@home.. Took two or three months to complete the damned thing. 😱
Whelp, that's a Pentium 120 for ya. 😎
Tim
Whelp, that's a Pentium 120 for ya. 😎
Tim
Member
Joined 2002
wonder how long it would take to finnish if you hade a dual zeon with 1 gig ram and 4 raid drives . ? heh.
oh crap that is my dream system.
And the system i want dual g5 prossessors running at 2gig 1 gig ram and 128meg video with 2 x 20" crt's YUM YUM.
oh crap that is my dream system.
And the system i want dual g5 prossessors running at 2gig 1 gig ram and 128meg video with 2 x 20" crt's YUM YUM.
i think the first machine i had running SETI was
a Celery 300a overclocked to 450mhz! That was
a cool chip!
Now i run only AMD's : )
...Now i think i could be talked into using one of those
17" PowerBooks! They are sooo sweet. The portables
are the one place Apple just kicks some major a$$.
m.
a Celery 300a overclocked to 450mhz! That was
a cool chip!
Now i run only AMD's : )
...Now i think i could be talked into using one of those
17" PowerBooks! They are sooo sweet. The portables
are the one place Apple just kicks some major a$$.
m.
707 units and 1.248 years
I was gonna beat you! I had it running on quite a few pc's at my work. But they shut that channel down, and I could post no more results..
Now it is on my laptop and about 1 unit per week goes out :-(
I could try the queing software..but ...well..have to work as well sometimes..
Cheers,
Bas
I was gonna beat you! I had it running on quite a few pc's at my work. But they shut that channel down, and I could post no more results..
Now it is on my laptop and about 1 unit per week goes out :-(
I could try the queing software..but ...well..have to work as well sometimes..
Cheers,
Bas
old threads aren't dead.
they are just sleeping -
they are just sleeping -
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.