Semi Portable Sound System Design

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Hi all,
After many years of thinking about how great it would be to build a set of speakers from scratch I've finally decided to give it a go.
I've selected a set of drivers, modelled them in WinISD and now I thought that I would post what I've done here for you guys to take a quick look over, see if I've made any glaringly obvious mistakes.

The idea is to build a reasonably small sound system, comprised of a pair of full way bookshelf speakers and a subwoofer; all powered by amps built into the boxes. (I'm not sure if I've posted in the right section here, so do feel free to move this thread if necessary)
It will be semi-portable in the sense that the bookshelf speakers will be able to clip onto the sides of the sub and the whole system picked up by hand, therefore being easy to move between rooms. It won't be battery powered though. So it will be designed to be reasonably lightweight and with smallish dimensions.

For the bookshelf speakers I've selected the Dayton Audio RS100-4, for the following reasons:
  • 4 inch diameter
  • Fairly low cost
  • What seems to be a good full range response
When modelled in a sealed 2.14L enclosure the -3dB point is at 113.5Hz; so a nice and small enclosure that goes low enough for a sub to reach up to.
The only thing I'm wondering about is that the high end response gets a bit choppy above 1.5KHz; It's all within about 6dB.
Do you guys think this would be acceptable without a tweeter or equalisation?
Here's a link to the datasheet which shows the high end response:
Datasheet - RS100-4 > Loudspeaker Freaks

For the Subwoofer I've selected the Tang Band W5-1138SMF for it's:
  • 5 inch diameter
  • Again reasonable price
  • 40W RMS
When modelled in a ported 8.13L enclosure, tuned to 41.55Hz; with a 33.54cm length and 4.7cm diameter vent it hits 36.84Hz at -3dB, which seems pretty good.
The vent will fit OK within a cubic box if it has a 90 degree bend about half way through.
And either I'll get a plate amp with an adjustable crossover or build a set crossover.

What do you think? Does this seem like a reasonable design so far?

Any help is greatly appreciated! :)

Thanks,

Will

PS: I've attached a WinISD screenshot of the responses of the two drivers next to each other, with a second order butterworth crossover at 100Hz on the subwoofer.
 

Attachments

  • Combined response.jpg
    Combined response.jpg
    138.1 KB · Views: 124
So after a lot of calculations and playing around I came up with the following Passive Radiator Design:

Active Driver: Tang Band W5-1138SMF
Passive Radiator (2 Used): Dayton Audio SD175-PR
Tuning Frequency: 42.99Hz
Internal Box Volume: 11.45L
Added Mass Per PR: 18.17g

Here Are the full calculations:

Passive Radiator Calculations (5 Inch Driver)
Active Driver maximum air displacement = 94 x 0.92 = 86.48cm^3
Require Passive Radiator with maximum air displacement >= 130cm^3

Passive Radiator Sd = 128.7 x 0.8 = 102.96cm^3
Therefore, two passive radiators would be required to meet the minimum air displacement.

Mass Calculations:
R (Equivalent Port Radius) = (2Sd/Pi)^0.5 = 9.05cm
L (Required Port Length) = (23562.5*Dv^2*Np/(Fb^2*Vb))-(k*Dv)
= (23562.5*18.1^2*1/(42.99^2*11.44))-(0.732*18.1)
= 351.61cm
Pv (Port Volume) = (Pi*R2)*L = 90519.86cm^3 = 0.9051986m^3
Ma (Total Added Mass) = Pv * Density of air = 0.9051986*1.23 = 0.111339kg = 111.34g
Md (Added Mass Per Driver) = (Ma- (2*37.5))/2 =18.17g

Looks good eh? Not quite as low response as the ported design but doesn't require a metre and a half of tubing...
I've attached the response plot too.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    29.7 KB · Views: 69
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.