Hello,
Quick intro - I got interested in electronics by building an analog modular synthesizer. I had to learn a lot of electrical engineering to complete that beast (well it will never be complete! That's the problem w/ modulars..).
I rescued an old 50's magnatone amp out of the garbage a couple of months ago, and repaired it. After seeing how simple the circuit is, I quickly became obsessed w/ the idea of building a tube hifi amp for my home. I've done a LOT of reading over the past couple of months now, and am unfortunately past the point of knowing what I want to do and back to being thoroughly confused. (I'm sure you've all been here... learning about things on the internet is a difficult task w/ all the conflicting opinions, and the realization that 1/2 of what you're reading is 15 years old, and the other half is new).
So, I know this question has been answered but I've got to ask again to see what current opinions are.
I'm building a single sided 2a3 amp. (don't need a lot of power)
The 2001 schematic at Angela got me started, and was going to be the basis of my project.
Now I'm sort of confused about the input stage, and of course about the output.
Input possibilities are the basic single tube dual triode. (easy)
or
A srpp design like the kismet3 (He seems very excited about it, but I read posts in this forum dismissing the idea, saying it's better to stick to something like the Angela schematic)
Then I'm also wondering if I need a preamp. I'd like the input to have enough gain that I will not. I'll (sadly) mostly be playing digital music from a high end music production sound card. I do have good turntables, but the truth is, most of my music is on the computer now days. The point to that is that I guess the sound card could be considered a "pre amp". (let me know if im on the right track in thinking that)
Output... I'm just wondering what people currently think about going w/ a parallel feed output (like the parafeed magnaquest, EXO) or a more conventional s.e. transformer (lets say the other magnaquest DS or Hammond, james, etc, etc.)
So.. that's not meant to be a comparison of transformers, but a comparison of output topologies.
I'll also mention that since I am using digital music, I wouldn't mind the amp adding a little color to the music.
My music interests are all over the place from classical to classic rock to indy to electronic of all kinds.
My existing amp is an early 90's digital tuner/amp combo, so I'd imagine anything will be better than it!
Well. Thanks for any advice. I thought I knew what I was going to build, but I can't seem to get past all the conflicting and possibly outdated info at this point.
Quick intro - I got interested in electronics by building an analog modular synthesizer. I had to learn a lot of electrical engineering to complete that beast (well it will never be complete! That's the problem w/ modulars..).
I rescued an old 50's magnatone amp out of the garbage a couple of months ago, and repaired it. After seeing how simple the circuit is, I quickly became obsessed w/ the idea of building a tube hifi amp for my home. I've done a LOT of reading over the past couple of months now, and am unfortunately past the point of knowing what I want to do and back to being thoroughly confused. (I'm sure you've all been here... learning about things on the internet is a difficult task w/ all the conflicting opinions, and the realization that 1/2 of what you're reading is 15 years old, and the other half is new).
So, I know this question has been answered but I've got to ask again to see what current opinions are.
I'm building a single sided 2a3 amp. (don't need a lot of power)
The 2001 schematic at Angela got me started, and was going to be the basis of my project.
Now I'm sort of confused about the input stage, and of course about the output.
Input possibilities are the basic single tube dual triode. (easy)
or
A srpp design like the kismet3 (He seems very excited about it, but I read posts in this forum dismissing the idea, saying it's better to stick to something like the Angela schematic)
Then I'm also wondering if I need a preamp. I'd like the input to have enough gain that I will not. I'll (sadly) mostly be playing digital music from a high end music production sound card. I do have good turntables, but the truth is, most of my music is on the computer now days. The point to that is that I guess the sound card could be considered a "pre amp". (let me know if im on the right track in thinking that)
Output... I'm just wondering what people currently think about going w/ a parallel feed output (like the parafeed magnaquest, EXO) or a more conventional s.e. transformer (lets say the other magnaquest DS or Hammond, james, etc, etc.)
So.. that's not meant to be a comparison of transformers, but a comparison of output topologies.
I'll also mention that since I am using digital music, I wouldn't mind the amp adding a little color to the music.
My music interests are all over the place from classical to classic rock to indy to electronic of all kinds.
My existing amp is an early 90's digital tuner/amp combo, so I'd imagine anything will be better than it!
Well. Thanks for any advice. I thought I knew what I was going to build, but I can't seem to get past all the conflicting and possibly outdated info at this point.
wicked1 said:
See? That's what you get for hanging around here.
I would stick with "simple" here. I don't like the SRPP since this topology is balanced for the one specific load impedance where the source and sink currents are equal. Otherwise, it goes out of balance and the distortion rises. If you're operating it for the voltage gain, it might be OK. (In that case, a mu-stage would be better anyway.)
Better to design for an input sensitivity ~1.0Vrms. Most CD players, tape decks, sound cards, will run that nicely. Use an outboard preamp for the turntable.
It's all good. The most important thing here is component quality, especially if there is no gNFB. When it comes to output "iron", this is not the place for cost-cutting if you want the best sonics.
I just did the JE Labs 45, simple version. I used James 6123 for OT & entire project exceded all expectations. It beats my 300B PP amp in superior sonics. I would go the 6123 route if were you also, they are a wonderfull sounding OT for about $ 225.00 for the pair. Only thing I changed was the use of PPcaps, aka Solen's in PS & that was it.All op-points were spot on 1st go around & has been playing music every since. Extremely low hum on 99db speakers. I can see you selling all your non tube amps in near future........
Brion55 said:
It all started w/ a Paia kit! then it grew and grew from there. I learned a lot from that point and eventually started making my own circuits and PCB's. Here's a link to my website about it. The site is incomplete and outdated (it's grown a lot since I made it) but you can get the idea.
www.sdiy.org/wicked1
JandG said:
Where'd you get the James? The 123 isn't listed on euphonia, and neither them, or a couple of places in Asia have replied to my emails over the past couple of weeks.
Thanks everyone!!!! I almost expected to get flamed for asking those questions!
I'd still like to hear a little more about parallel feed vs standard S.E. output if there is more to it. I'd probably go between the James 6123, hammond 1600 series(not the best, but seems to be a really good value.. especially since no one seems to want to sell me a James), or the magnaquest parafeeds. If the parafeeds don't make that much of a difference, I guess I'll avoid them, as that way I can stick to the Angela schematic for my first build.
thanks again
THL in Taiwan finally just got back to me. Their price was only slightly less than what Euphonia is asking (but there is a note on euphonia's website saying they might have to increase prices). I sent Euphonia another email direct this time, instead of using the web form. Hopefully that will get to them.
Lundahl LL1623AM SE OPT
Hey,
I have built a 45 SE tube amp with LL1620AM OPT. It sounds extremely good indeed.
I would highly recommend you would spend some more money in the OPT which will be worth for your investment.
The Lundahl Amorphous C-core provides very wide bandwidth from low to high. The music is just breathing out from the speakers.
I just tested my 45 amp with B&W801 Speakers. Wowhhhh..
JOhnny
Hey,
I have built a 45 SE tube amp with LL1620AM OPT. It sounds extremely good indeed.
I would highly recommend you would spend some more money in the OPT which will be worth for your investment.
The Lundahl Amorphous C-core provides very wide bandwidth from low to high. The music is just breathing out from the speakers.
I just tested my 45 amp with B&W801 Speakers. Wowhhhh..
JOhnny
Your synth projects look great! Bet it sounds good too!
While working for PAIA, (mid 70's) I managed to amass a rather large 2 manual modular which was later stolen from my apartment. We would draw a kit from a production run and build it for quality control and testing. When finished, we got to take it home! In those days, they were using linear VCO's which were problematic in many ways. I had planned to eventually replace them with log VCO's, but never had the chance.
While working for PAIA, (mid 70's) I managed to amass a rather large 2 manual modular which was later stolen from my apartment. We would draw a kit from a production run and build it for quality control and testing. When finished, we got to take it home! In those days, they were using linear VCO's which were problematic in many ways. I had planned to eventually replace them with log VCO's, but never had the chance.
Re: Lundahl LL1623AM SE OPT
How important do you thinkthe amorphous core is? Would the same transformer in the standard version be noticeably worse to untrained ears? Maybe I should say is it worth double the cost?
There are two ways to look at it. This is my first amp project, so maybe I should do it right the first time, and not have to spend any more money. On the other hand... This is my first amp project, so I can always do better on the next one.
Thanks! The thing is awesome! (not bragging here.. It's all other peoples circuit designs, maybe slightly modified)
If you haven't gotten another modular over the years, I highly recommend you build yourself a small synth.
I've been playing with a bunch of clocking and logic modules with sample/holds and sequential switches, a quantizer, etc.. So, not focusing on the sound as much as working with the synth to write songs. It's sort of 1/2 my input, and half something totally crazy the synth does.
It's led me in a direction I could have never dreamed of before I started playing around w/ the modular. If I'm ever bored, that thing will always keep me occupied and bring a smile to my face!!
kmtang said:
How important do you thinkthe amorphous core is? Would the same transformer in the standard version be noticeably worse to untrained ears? Maybe I should say is it worth double the cost?
There are two ways to look at it. This is my first amp project, so maybe I should do it right the first time, and not have to spend any more money. On the other hand... This is my first amp project, so I can always do better on the next one
.Brion55 said:
Thanks! The thing is awesome! (not bragging here.. It's all other peoples circuit designs, maybe slightly modified)
If you haven't gotten another modular over the years, I highly recommend you build yourself a small synth.
I've been playing with a bunch of clocking and logic modules with sample/holds and sequential switches, a quantizer, etc.. So, not focusing on the sound as much as working with the synth to write songs. It's sort of 1/2 my input, and half something totally crazy the synth does.
It's led me in a direction I could have never dreamed of before I started playing around w/ the modular. If I'm ever bored, that thing will always keep me occupied and bring a smile to my face!!
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.