Non L version with Dibirama datas 91.5/2.83v in the 80/300 hz. Sealed 62l Qtc:0.82, max spl/2.83V in 4Pi : 86.6 dB, LP 12dB for acoustical 250 hz (-6 dB). No LT.
pretty close, the main differences are the Qtc : 0.82 vs 0.58 (RNXL) and sligthy less Vb for the RNXL (-5.5 L). +1 dB sensivity for the RNX75-6 if taking acount of Dibirama Clio TS measurements, despite RNXL being same sensivity (than Dibirama datas)
pretty close, the main differences are the Qtc : 0.82 vs 0.58 (RNXL) and sligthy less Vb for the RNXL (-5.5 L). +1 dB sensivity for the RNX75-6 if taking acount of Dibirama Clio TS measurements, despite RNXL being same sensivity (than Dibirama datas)
Last edited:
I don't know which sounds better in this scenario of 250 Hz acoustical where both are okay. 95% of the music is okay with F3 at 40 hz so both are okay here.
According @profiguy , they sounds more the same than different if not crossing the 34RNX75-6 above circa 200/250 Hz. And it is -80 euros than the L version. Not sure the better L version THD matters in tthe bass for human ears, but I don't know...
Hope that helps.
According @profiguy , they sounds more the same than different if not crossing the 34RNX75-6 above circa 200/250 Hz. And it is -80 euros than the L version. Not sure the better L version THD matters in tthe bass for human ears, but I don't know...
Hope that helps.
Last edited: