Thanks!
I'm trying a new crossover design.
The version of such a crossover was taken from this project by me: SB17CAC35-8-SB26CDC-C000-4-lub-CRC-NAC-NRX-MFC-STC-ADC-2-5
Which one do you think is better?
In version 2 of crossover, I used the new FRD and ZMA files by Dave Bullet. This affected the impedance.
I'm trying a new crossover design.
The version of such a crossover was taken from this project by me: SB17CAC35-8-SB26CDC-C000-4-lub-CRC-NAC-NRX-MFC-STC-ADC-2-5
Which one do you think is better?
In version 2 of crossover, I used the new FRD and ZMA files by Dave Bullet. This affected the impedance.
Last edited:
Version 1. Electrical phase is much more sensible so should work with the majority of amps old and new, cheap and expensive.
As you turn up the volume on version 2 you might find the protection kicking in.
Time to see if you can simplify and keep the basic frequency response shape, and at the same time have sensible impedance without big phase changes.
As you turn up the volume on version 2 you might find the protection kicking in.
Time to see if you can simplify and keep the basic frequency response shape, and at the same time have sensible impedance without big phase changes.
What driver Z offsets are you using?
Ver 1 looks better to me (no destructive interference between upper mid and tweeter)
I'd try and lift the upper mid/woofer response in the 400-1000Hz area so it tapers to the current midrange / tweeter level.
Ver 1 looks better to me (no destructive interference between upper mid and tweeter)
I'd try and lift the upper mid/woofer response in the 400-1000Hz area so it tapers to the current midrange / tweeter level.