What's the replacement for Rubycon ZA caps - they put out another low ESR series as the ZA series is discontinued.
Last edited:
Just replaced a bunch of caps on the analog part of a soundcard, the ASUS Essence STX. So far they sound pretty grainy and lack bass, but I know rubycons have a burn-in time. Will see how they sound in a couple of days 😀
Rubycon ZLG
Rubycon ZLG caps in decent capacity (330uf-680uf) sound great, nice mids and highs compared to Nichicon Fine Gold they replaced. However the bass sounds a bit recessed but still great on certain tracks when compared to the Nichicons or Panasonic FC series. Depends on the source CD/mixing/mastering engineer... they may be too analytic & revealing.
Somebody else's opinion for a good series of Rubycon caps for analog audio ... I need my PRAT back 🙂
Rubycon ZLG caps in decent capacity (330uf-680uf) sound great, nice mids and highs compared to Nichicon Fine Gold they replaced. However the bass sounds a bit recessed but still great on certain tracks when compared to the Nichicons or Panasonic FC series. Depends on the source CD/mixing/mastering engineer... they may be too analytic & revealing.
Somebody else's opinion for a good series of Rubycon caps for analog audio ... I need my PRAT back 🙂
Last edited:
Nichicon KZ. Black gate...
Bass and very powerfull midrange, highs are also good. FG and Silmic II are softer.
Ultra low impedance caps are good in digital sections but not in analog. As you describe, pronounced highs, hard lifeless midrange and dry bass. Similar os-con, Panasonic FR, FM...
Bass and very powerfull midrange, highs are also good. FG and Silmic II are softer.
Ultra low impedance caps are good in digital sections but not in analog. As you describe, pronounced highs, hard lifeless midrange and dry bass. Similar os-con, Panasonic FR, FM...
ZLG is low-ESR and durable, but not as linear as some older series. YXA and YXG are generally better sounding in analog bypass, though I don't mind using ZL and ZLH in bypass locations.
In the signal or feedback path, Nichicon UD and Elna RJB are more linear.
I wouldn't put oscon in analog, they're dry like hell and have lots of midbass that ain't supposed to be there. However they rule on digital supplies.
ZLG for analog sounds clean but analytical, nice highs though and they have a very articulate bass, but some tracks seem to not have bass in sufficient quantity by recording. Will see how things change with a good clock, remember I tried them on a (decent) soundcard.
Somebody with an good sounding cap that I can find on Farnell... I can get them fast and cheap where I live.
Last edited:
I have written that Oscons are good at analog??? Read once again. OScons and similar are for digital decoupling.
Farnell doesn*t have KZ or Silmic on stock. Try partsxonection uk. I bought it at Mouser.
Farnell doesn*t have KZ or Silmic on stock. Try partsxonection uk. I bought it at Mouser.
Rubycon ZLG & ZLH
They seem to sound nice after a couple of days burn-in. I identified what caused the hollow sound and they were a couple of Panasonic FC on the analog supplies prior to the regulators and FC sound dull & sterile IMHO.
They seem to sound nice after a couple of days burn-in. I identified what caused the hollow sound and they were a couple of Panasonic FC on the analog supplies prior to the regulators and FC sound dull & sterile IMHO.
Last edited:
FC is the cause of bad sound at various locations, but it is most often metallic and screechy (i.e. it usually causes brightness, not dullness), but YMMV. Direct substitution of Panasonic FM for FC will almost always improve things.
I have no idea why people are obsessed with the FC - it's possible that there were no better commodity 105-degree low-ESR caps available 20+ years ago when they were introduced. Now there are plenty.
With high frequency anolog, lets say digital tpa3116 Panasonic FM and FR completely reduce cymbals to noise and attenuate, weaken, cymbals. Worst caps I heard with tpa3116 regarding detailed highs, ZLH among the best.
Class-D is entirely different, and I probably wouldn't use unbypassed electrolytics anywhere there, but YMMV. ZLH is good in a wide variety of digital and analog applications, but has magnetic leads (like FC and FM) and is only slightly more linear (lower tan delta) than comparable FC and FM. I have been using it in non-critical analog bypass locations, but not in the signal path anywhere (I may try it in a feedback DC blocking location eventually).
Assumption the FM/FR are without (ceramic) bypasses is false. Yet they reduce treble detail and attenuate🙂
Ditto on the Pana FCs; have no idea why anyone with a soldering iron would keep those.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.