Resistor parasitic inductance

Replaced an old resistor yesterday that I suspected might be part of an oscillation issue I'm trying to track down (it wasn't). As part of it, I measured its inductance, and the inductance of a couple of replacement parts. I was quite surprised:

At 10Khz:

Old carbon comp, 200ohm, 0.5W: 200nH
Metal film, 220ohm, 1W: 220nH
Metal film, 220ohm, 0.6W: 670nH



Why this huge difference? The inductance (in this case), seems proportional to the physical size of the resistor. Is that a coincidence? Is there any general rule of thumb here, and are there any scenarios where it matters enough to be aware of?
 
How did you make the measurement?
At 10kHz, 200nH is an impedance of 0.012ohm, absolutely tiny compared to 200ohm, meaning you need very robust and accurate measurement means to extract the pure reactive part.
The carb comp resistor should have ~0, the same as a piece of wire of the same length.

Film resistor are spiralled, and can have a few nH, tens of nH at most. 670nH sounds suspiciously high
 
At 10Khz:

Old carbon comp, 200ohm, 0.5W: 200nH
Metal film, 220ohm, 1W: 220nH
Metal film, 220ohm, 0.6W: 670nH

Why this huge difference? The inductance (in this case), seems proportional to the physical size of the resistor. Is that a coincidence? Is there any general rule of thumb here, and are there any scenarios where it matters enough to be aware of?
Inductance depends _strongly_ on dimensions, wire length, wire thickness, and of course resistance-trace winding pattern.
In general the larger the component the more inductance, as current has to flow round a larger loop and loop-area is pretty dominant.

Also the thinner the wire the higher the inductance as this increases current-density.

Inductance is just the ratio of total magnetic flux of the circuit under test to the current through that circuit.