• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Replacing the ECL86/PCL86 with two tubes

I did that, and I don't see any conflict with the suggestion. What were you thinking?

I was thinking that TS was looking for a plug-and-play replacement for the ECL86. I thought that solutions with one or more cables running out of the radio (or making extra provisions in all the radios to be able to connect the extra power supply) was not a a plug-and-play solution within the terms/conditions of this thread.
 
Because a voltage doubler produces about 13-14V you might end up needing a buck/boost converter, which is much more complex than a step-up or step-down.



Please keep in mind P tubes are specified for a particular current, not voltage. So i think its best to use current mode feedback instead of voltage mode feedback.



If you account for diode losses and a switcher of about 80% efficiency, i reckon that the current from the 6.3V will be about +35-40% over that of an ECL86. ((1/0.8)*100)+20%


rectifying the 6.3 directly by means of a bridge is quite lossy. So if you use a doubler you end up with about 13-14V under load (300mA), or so PSUD2 says.
 
Last edited: