So, this is what I meant:
Local feedback on the cascoded PI, local feedback on the EL34, 43%UL connection, fixed bias.
B+ at 450V, 4k Raa for a quad of EL34 per channel (8k Raa per pair) using the cheap OPT Toroidy TTG-KT88PP ( TTG-KT88PP - Tube output transformer [4kOhm] 2xKT88 / 2x300B Push-pull or similar - Shop Toroidy.pl ).
This is what I get at 40 Wrms:
And this is what I get at 75 Wrms:
Local feedback on the cascoded PI, local feedback on the EL34, 43%UL connection, fixed bias.
B+ at 450V, 4k Raa for a quad of EL34 per channel (8k Raa per pair) using the cheap OPT Toroidy TTG-KT88PP ( TTG-KT88PP - Tube output transformer [4kOhm] 2xKT88 / 2x300B Push-pull or similar - Shop Toroidy.pl ).
This is what I get at 40 Wrms:
Code:
Harmonic Frequency Fourier Normalized Phase Normalized
Number [Hz] Component Component [degree] Phase [deg]
1 1.000e+03 1.245e+01 1.000e+00 -2.08° 0.00°
2 2.000e+03 3.366e-03 2.704e-04 -99.67° -97.59°
3 3.000e+03 1.201e-03 9.645e-05 -34.60° -32.52°
4 4.000e+03 2.173e-04 1.745e-05 172.16° 174.24°
5 5.000e+03 8.081e-04 6.491e-05 174.92° 177.00°
6 6.000e+03 1.428e-04 1.147e-05 179.61° 181.69°
7 7.000e+03 9.675e-05 7.772e-06 -178.56° -176.48°
8 8.000e+03 1.071e-04 8.600e-06 179.71° 181.79°
9 9.000e+03 9.624e-05 7.731e-06 179.60° 181.68°
Total Harmonic Distortion: 0.029542%(0.029614%)
And this is what I get at 75 Wrms:
Code:
Harmonic Frequency Fourier Normalized Phase Normalized
Number [Hz] Component Component [degree] Phase [deg]
1 1.000e+03 2.432e+01 1.000e+00 -2.07° 0.00°
2 2.000e+03 1.268e-02 5.212e-04 -96.47° -94.40°
3 3.000e+03 3.907e-01 1.607e-02 -4.12° -2.05°
4 4.000e+03 8.601e-04 3.537e-05 -111.21° -109.14°
5 5.000e+03 1.753e-01 7.207e-03 174.70° 176.77°
6 6.000e+03 1.207e-03 4.964e-05 -113.89° -111.82°
7 7.000e+03 4.301e-02 1.768e-03 -8.26° -6.20°
8 8.000e+03 1.845e-03 7.587e-05 89.06° 91.13°
9 9.000e+03 7.451e-03 3.064e-04 1.88° 3.95°
Total Harmonic Distortion: 1.770779%(1.772507%)
Attachments
Hi Zintolo,
I took your model, added the second pair of EL34, adjusted the transformer to 4k and used a much smaller time step to increase accuracy for THD analysis. Distortion at 40W is more like 0.4%, not 0.03%. Some observations:
-220k anode resistors driving 100k grid resistors doesn't really make sense
-You are running the ECC88s at very low current and missing out on the gm and reduced distortion available at higher currents
-The cascode output impedance is very high, and so there is significant drop in response at higher frequencies due to the output stage input capacitance
-The "Baby Huey" style of Schade feedback results in relatively high distortion, especially at higher outputs
-I don't think the anode to grid feedback in the top ECC88 is doing much except reducing gain, perhaps helping a bit with output impedance
- The simulation indicates significantly better results by increasing total LTP current to about 8 mA, dropping the anode resistor value a lot to end up with with ~230V on the top anode, and connect it to B+, increasing output stage grid resistors as much as you can within the allowable limits, and adding a touch of normal Schade feedback with a large value resistor from the output stage anodes back to the cascode anodes. See attached schematic - sorry I can't paste the .asc file because it only works with my custom setup.
I took your model, added the second pair of EL34, adjusted the transformer to 4k and used a much smaller time step to increase accuracy for THD analysis. Distortion at 40W is more like 0.4%, not 0.03%. Some observations:
-220k anode resistors driving 100k grid resistors doesn't really make sense
-You are running the ECC88s at very low current and missing out on the gm and reduced distortion available at higher currents
-The cascode output impedance is very high, and so there is significant drop in response at higher frequencies due to the output stage input capacitance
-The "Baby Huey" style of Schade feedback results in relatively high distortion, especially at higher outputs
-I don't think the anode to grid feedback in the top ECC88 is doing much except reducing gain, perhaps helping a bit with output impedance
- The simulation indicates significantly better results by increasing total LTP current to about 8 mA, dropping the anode resistor value a lot to end up with with ~230V on the top anode, and connect it to B+, increasing output stage grid resistors as much as you can within the allowable limits, and adding a touch of normal Schade feedback with a large value resistor from the output stage anodes back to the cascode anodes. See attached schematic - sorry I can't paste the .asc file because it only works with my custom setup.
Attachments
Distortion results below. I adjusted my modified design to have the same overall gain as your original. At the 75W level my design is showing a third harmonic null at the expense of increased higher harmonics, which I don't like, but this is very loud!
Original 40W
h2: =0.0315032092506
h3: =0.409874872129
h4: =0.000354041077567
h5: =0.0226018076673
h6: =4.59094531546e-005
h7: =0.00441202309383
h8: =1.48431376653e-005
h9: =4.88507156465e-005
h10: =5.80079842587e-006
thd_percent: =0.411728430821
Original 75W
h2: =0.0268244677021
h3: =2.00424930184
h4: =0.00949697117794
h5: =0.665648411797
h6: =0.00068367372055
h7: =0.201484787807
h8: =0.00347975180635
h9: =0.0107504218798
h10: =0.00274185935496
thd_percent: =2.1217079445
Modified by Tikiroo 40W
h2: =0.00997468749244
h3: =0.259661197608
h4: =0.000434333355478
h5: =0.0132402618585
h6: =2.18364287534e-0 05
h7: =0.00314518374474
h8: =7.74868906295e-006
h9: =0.000572668165842
h10: =6.98257454794e-006
thd_percent: =0.260209811169
Modified by Tikiroo 75W
h2: =0.0198604882521
h3: =0.309708861062
h4: =0.00386727317228
h5: =0.416522374217
h6: =0.00129854131048
h7: =0.174987446959
h8: =0.000382866072871
h9: =0.0577160319939
h10: =3.88212608685e-005
thd_persent: =0.551156459533
Original 40W
h2: =0.0315032092506
h3: =0.409874872129
h4: =0.000354041077567
h5: =0.0226018076673
h6: =4.59094531546e-005
h7: =0.00441202309383
h8: =1.48431376653e-005
h9: =4.88507156465e-005
h10: =5.80079842587e-006
thd_percent: =0.411728430821
Original 75W
h2: =0.0268244677021
h3: =2.00424930184
h4: =0.00949697117794
h5: =0.665648411797
h6: =0.00068367372055
h7: =0.201484787807
h8: =0.00347975180635
h9: =0.0107504218798
h10: =0.00274185935496
thd_percent: =2.1217079445
Modified by Tikiroo 40W
h2: =0.00997468749244
h3: =0.259661197608
h4: =0.000434333355478
h5: =0.0132402618585
h6: =2.18364287534e-0 05
h7: =0.00314518374474
h8: =7.74868906295e-006
h9: =0.000572668165842
h10: =6.98257454794e-006
thd_percent: =0.260209811169
Modified by Tikiroo 75W
h2: =0.0198604882521
h3: =0.309708861062
h4: =0.00386727317228
h5: =0.416522374217
h6: =0.00129854131048
h7: =0.174987446959
h8: =0.000382866072871
h9: =0.0577160319939
h10: =3.88212608685e-005
thd_persent: =0.551156459533
How do you calculate your output power. For me 24Vp on 6ohms is 48W, how do you find 75W?So, this is what I meant:
Local feedback on the cascoded PI, local feedback on the EL34, 43%UL connection, fixed bias.
B+ at 450V, 4k Raa for a quad of EL34 per channel (8k Raa per pair) using the cheap OPT Toroidy TTG-KT88PP ( TTG-KT88PP - Tube output transformer [4kOhm] 2xKT88 / 2x300B Push-pull or similar - Shop Toroidy.pl ).
This is what I get at 40 Wrms:
Code:Harmonic Frequency Fourier Normalized Phase Normalized Number [Hz] Component Component [degree] Phase [deg] 1 1.000e+03 1.245e+01 1.000e+00 -2.08° 0.00° 2 2.000e+03 3.366e-03 2.704e-04 -99.67° -97.59° 3 3.000e+03 1.201e-03 9.645e-05 -34.60° -32.52° 4 4.000e+03 2.173e-04 1.745e-05 172.16° 174.24° 5 5.000e+03 8.081e-04 6.491e-05 174.92° 177.00° 6 6.000e+03 1.428e-04 1.147e-05 179.61° 181.69° 7 7.000e+03 9.675e-05 7.772e-06 -178.56° -176.48° 8 8.000e+03 1.071e-04 8.600e-06 179.71° 181.79° 9 9.000e+03 9.624e-05 7.731e-06 179.60° 181.68° Total Harmonic Distortion: 0.029542%(0.029614%)
And this is what I get at 75 Wrms:
Code:Harmonic Frequency Fourier Normalized Phase Normalized Number [Hz] Component Component [degree] Phase [deg] 1 1.000e+03 2.432e+01 1.000e+00 -2.07° 0.00° 2 2.000e+03 1.268e-02 5.212e-04 -96.47° -94.40° 3 3.000e+03 3.907e-01 1.607e-02 -4.12° -2.05° 4 4.000e+03 8.601e-04 3.537e-05 -111.21° -109.14° 5 5.000e+03 1.753e-01 7.207e-03 174.70° 176.77° 6 6.000e+03 1.207e-03 4.964e-05 -113.89° -111.82° 7 7.000e+03 4.301e-02 1.768e-03 -8.26° -6.20° 8 8.000e+03 1.845e-03 7.587e-05 89.06° 91.13° 9 9.000e+03 7.451e-03 3.064e-04 1.88° 3.95° Total Harmonic Distortion: 1.770779%(1.772507%)
With 12.45Vp on 6.25 ohm is 12.4w, how 40w?
Last edited:
Thanks kokoriantz,
Please note that 4k Raa is for a quartet of EL34, not a pair.
Looking at the images you posted, best result you have got is with 450V B+, 35% UL, 33k on 200k anode to grid feedback, 6k6 Raa (3k3 per quartet) with 750 Ohm screen stoppers.
830Vpp means you reach 35 V at 250 mA. Are those THD numbers still valid with grid stoppers in? They are very impressive.
I'm wondering if, but then in a dedicated thread because here would be off topic, Rod Coleman's shunt cascode driver ( Shunt Cascode Power Valve Driver ) could be a better solution for this power amp.
As for the output transformer, Toroidy makes them up to 80 Wrms, so no way to use a quartet of EL34 having very clean 90 Wrms on paper. The closest one for a pair of EL34 is this one ( TTG-CFB6600PP - Tube output CFB transformer [6,6kOhm] Cathode Feedback Push-pull - Shop Toroidy.pl ) without using the CFB part.
Please note that 4k Raa is for a quartet of EL34, not a pair.
Looking at the images you posted, best result you have got is with 450V B+, 35% UL, 33k on 200k anode to grid feedback, 6k6 Raa (3k3 per quartet) with 750 Ohm screen stoppers.
830Vpp means you reach 35 V at 250 mA. Are those THD numbers still valid with grid stoppers in? They are very impressive.
I'm wondering if, but then in a dedicated thread because here would be off topic, Rod Coleman's shunt cascode driver ( Shunt Cascode Power Valve Driver ) could be a better solution for this power amp.
As for the output transformer, Toroidy makes them up to 80 Wrms, so no way to use a quartet of EL34 having very clean 90 Wrms on paper. The closest one for a pair of EL34 is this one ( TTG-CFB6600PP - Tube output CFB transformer [6,6kOhm] Cathode Feedback Push-pull - Shop Toroidy.pl ) without using the CFB part.
Zintolo posted a schematic with a single pair of el34 but his figures were for 2 pairs. With a single pair you are correct![]()
Thanks tikiroo, my fault indeed not having posted the right schematic since the beginning. I'd still prefer a quartet of EL34 per channel, but I've never used an amp with the OPT as a bottleneck, considering that part of the feedback is given by the OPT.
This configuration has been done more than a decade ago on this forum, he transformed the ST70 but driven by triodes. I will try by anode and ac reducing mutual resistor. The original Allen Wright I think uses the 6H30, this expensive Russian tube has extraordinary constant u and runs at low voltage. I once tried out using MJE1300X high voltage transistor in cascode, it worked well.
I tried by anode with 47k feedback, the sensitivity is lower but 2Vp is sufficient to saturate. It doesn't need mutual resistor. The distortion at 43W is 0.04%. The DF is always 7.
I tried by anode with 47k feedback, the sensitivity is lower but 2Vp is sufficient to saturate. It doesn't need mutual resistor. The distortion at 43W is 0.04%. The DF is always 7.
Last edited:
No , I am wrong with anode feedback. The cascode is biased 7 ma to output across 39k about +/- 270 volt on screen to become about +/-700V on anode. Already the bias was wrong it needed 9ma bias for full +/-800v. With anode feedback 56k needs +/-17ma for +/-800v, but biased 18ma the voltage drop leaves nothing for the driver.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- Question re Allen Wright PP-1cs