Quad AlPair10M³

Hi everyone .Some while ago I had a pair of alpair 10M in a vented pair of 15 liters and because I've loved it so much I built another pair of speakers with 2 pcs each (30 Liters) . Even better , stronger powerful , just perfect . Almost perfect , because I thought my self " what if I make a new pair with 4 drivers for each speaker ? " Honestly I was inspired from Eikona but I believe it's risky to just copy that plan because it might not match ; so I guess , classic vented will be enough .Can someone help me with winISD ? I'm not lazy but I'm just not very good with it .I'm open to suggestions . Thank you
 
thank you Jeff

I wouldn't say that this looks right.
I thought Alpair 10 goes lower then this
 

Attachments

  • 4 x alpair10,3m.png
    4 x alpair10,3m.png
    122.2 KB · Views: 169
  • alpair 10.3m.zip
    alpair 10.3m.zip
    647 bytes · Views: 54
It is certainly doable.

Maybe something like this?

http://wodendesign.com/downloads/Quadrapole-P11-MLTL.pdf

This for the P11, so not suited to the A10.3.

The drivers have been arranged EPI Tower style to give an omnidirectional response and avoid combing.

2 on the front and the other 2 on the sides would work as well, if you are happy with the combing in a pair.

Otherwise some method to relieve some of the driver sof their top end would be nescessary.

Would give more bottom (not lower) and be 5 dB more efficient (sensitivity depends on how they are wired.

This shows the alternates to straigy parallel, series, or series/parallel.

http://www.planet10-hifi.com/downloads/Quad-Driver-Wiring.pdf

dave
 
You may find it works for you, but you will likely need to play with a filter.

Toole has shown that combing looks worse than it sounds, but it is quite individual.

The further you are from the speakers the less the issue is.

I would go with something that has max 2 drivers firing forward running FR, and some find only 1 is best.

Do you have an amplifier happy with either really low impedance (2Ω) or high (32Ω)?

dave