Are these your designs or just copyright infringements?
In either case, what are you trying to say?
In either case, what are you trying to say?
,what are you trying to say?
Here we go again!
Mother weighs 20x less like a baby, the Moon is 80x lighter than earth-everything is somehow exactly calculated and it is similar in electronics, for the amplitude of the sine.
I do not know why it irritates good technique experts that only they themselves want to know it all.
Here we go again!
Mother weighs 20x less like a baby, the Moon is 80x lighter than earth-everything is somehow exactly calculated and it is similar in electronics, for the amplitude of the sine.
I do not know why it irritates good technique experts that only they themselves want to know it all.
You keep throwing schematics at us but never say anything about them. You never tell us where they came from, who made them or any other details.
Craig
Craig
I do not know why it irritates good technique experts
that only they themselves want to know it all.
Hi,
What irritates is posting allegedly "pure classic design techniques"
with what are essentially pointless utterly useless schematics.
You don't know your stuff, in the slightest, and complaining
already about those that do probably means you never will.
If I'm wrong, and you do know your stuff, your incredibly
inept at communicating your ideas and concepts to others.
Most people who do know their stuff will present one idea
at a time and be prepared for some rigourous argument.
rgds, sreten.
Last edited:
,what are you trying to say?
Here we go again!
Mother weighs 20x less like a baby, the Moon is 80x lighter than earth-everything is somehow exactly calculated and it is similar in electronics, for the amplitude of the sine.
I do not know why it irritates good technique experts that only they themselves want to know it all.
Some schematics, not a single word to follow them
And You wonder why it is irritating?
The reason the most of us are here for is to learn from others, and also to share knowlegde of things they have been able to get along the way whenb building some amps and so on.
A post as Your first noe here is completely useless.
problem is a hammer-nail and rigourous argument
These are just my own projects in the figure 1 is you can see the sense of pure and classical assumptions of the audio technique. Clean control of the transistors is the best audio quality.
I gave a dynamic measurement system linearity transistors, himself to be able to design amplifiers schemes, and look good transitrors.
These are just my own projects in the figure 1 is you can see the sense of pure and classical assumptions of the audio technique. Clean control of the transistors is the best audio quality.
I gave a dynamic measurement system linearity transistors, himself to be able to design amplifiers schemes, and look good transitrors.
Will you explain how your circuit works?
For projects it is necessary to measure the linearity of the transistors, and just watch the pilot 50mV
Drawings amplifiers are high power to the disco, or the average power to the club, and these are just examples of calculations.
For projects it is necessary to measure the linearity of the transistors, and just watch the pilot 50mV
Drawings amplifiers are high power to the disco, or the average power to the club, and these are just examples of calculations.
Attachments
The drawing number 2 can take a microphone amplifier and it will be known whether this pure sound technique is the best.
Is this another Turing test? Language issues don't help.
In post 2 I was puzzled. The OP's reply was unhelpful and somewhat baffling, as though I had annoyed him by asking two simple questions which any reasonable person would have answered. This is a forum for discussion about audio. What does the OP want to discuss?
In post 2 I was puzzled. The OP's reply was unhelpful and somewhat baffling, as though I had annoyed him by asking two simple questions which any reasonable person would have answered. This is a forum for discussion about audio. What does the OP want to discuss?
Talk is difficult because they do not know English, and the diagrams are all shown.
Audio amplifier for increased club.
Audio amplifier for increased club.
Attachments
Last edited:
Transistor junction temperature is not transistor case temperature.
Acoustic amplifier is cooled by the circulating water.
French transistors 2x BD 255/254 or 2x BD 355/354 are also good(MJE15031/15028).
Acoustic amplifier is cooled by the circulating water.
French transistors 2x BD 255/254 or 2x BD 355/354 are also good(MJE15031/15028).
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Pure audio classic technique