^ unless you are plugging in a value like 2 ohms for ESR 😛 according to the formula a 10,000 uF cap has an impedance of around 0.01 ohms at 100Hz.... the ESR of a good 10,000uF cap will be around 0.05 ohms. so plugging in 2 ohms as per the original post surely does make a difference!! (it certainly does in spice!!)
Obviously with smaller caps and low frequencies the impedance due to reactance will dominate. Sorry just butting in because I'm learning from this too 🙂 I have a vague idea of how things work but tend to gloss over the actual theory (especially when it involves equations) 🙄
Tony.
Obviously with smaller caps and low frequencies the impedance due to reactance will dominate. Sorry just butting in because I'm learning from this too 🙂 I have a vague idea of how things work but tend to gloss over the actual theory (especially when it involves equations) 🙄
Tony.
Last edited:
Here's where practice intrudes- in a high voltage circuit, you're unlikely to find 1,000u, much less 10,000u! 😀 In the C1 position, you'd arc the rectifiers. In the C2 position, the sheer size and the ESR will probably not have a major effect because of the choke.
In any case, once the O/P is confident in his ability to do the basic calculations, the right numbers can be plugged into the sim.
In any case, once the O/P is confident in his ability to do the basic calculations, the right numbers can be plugged into the sim.
I'll let you compute the values for 60Hz, 120Hz, 240Hz, and 960Hz.
According to my results, it looks like as the frequency is doubled, the impedance is cut in half.
120hz - 66.3
240hz - 33.1
960hz - 8.3
Excellent, you're getting a general feel for the numbers! Now, how do those numbers change with 2 ohms of ESR? Remember to use the right formula...
Here's where practice intrudes- in a high voltage circuit, you're unlikely to find 1,000u, much less 10,000u! 😀 In the C1 position, you'd arc the rectifiers. In the C2 position, the sheer size and the ESR will probably not have a major effect because of the choke.
In any case, once the O/P is confident in his ability to do the basic calculations, the right numbers can be plugged into the sim.
That will teach me not to look carefully at the schematic!! I didn't realize that this was a valve supply with such small caps... I've never used anything less than 1000uF in a power supply for smoothing caps as I've only ever done SS! Sorry for side tracking!
Tony.
At the 60hz level adding the ESR increased the impedance by .015 ohms, which is nothing really added to 132 ohm
At the 960hz level adding the ESR increased the impedance by 8.54 ohms, which is more than doubling the impedance since it started out at 8.3 ohms, and making a total of 16.84 ohms.
At the 960hz level adding the ESR increased the impedance by 8.54 ohms, which is more than doubling the impedance since it started out at 8.3 ohms, and making a total of 16.84 ohms.
At the 960hz level adding the ESR increased the impedance by 8.54 ohms, which is more than doubling the impedance since it started out at 8.3 ohms, and making a total of 16.84 ohms.
You may want to recheck your work. sqrt (8.542 + 22) is not going to be 16!😀
sqrt (Xc2 + ESR2).
sqrt (8.32 + 22) = 8.54
right?
where 8.3 is the Z at 960Hz
Not sure why I was adding 8.54 back to 8.3 to get 16.84 *scratches head*
Last edited:
Should have said equating the ESR raised the impedance by .23 ohms.
Just noticed that someone gave this thread a 1 star rating. Is this that dumb of a question???
Just noticed that someone gave this thread a 1 star rating. Is this that dumb of a question???
OK, so now you've spotted something important- the capacitive impedance is infinite at DC, drops proportionately with frequency, and has the ESR as an asymptote. You also understand that for small caps (like 20u), the ESR is not going to be a big contributor- in your sim, you can see this by varying it from 0.1 ohm to 2 ohms and seeing the difference in the output voltage and ripple.
Now there's one more complication that you'll need to learn about (equivalent series inductance), but that's not a big issue at the low frequencies you're working with, and you can put that off for another day.
Now there's one more complication that you'll need to learn about (equivalent series inductance), but that's not a big issue at the low frequencies you're working with, and you can put that off for another day.
The manufacturing tolerance of the VT rectifiers and/or the series resistance of the choke will swamp out the effect the ESR of the filter caps, they're the least of your worries... Remember that you are not building for NASA, just a geetar amp ;-)
Yes they will swamp it as far as values go; but they are in different parts of the circuit thus have different impacts. You can't disregard cap ESR because of transformer or diode ESR.
Jan
Yes they will swamp it as far as values go; but they are in different parts of the circuit thus have different impacts. You can't disregard cap ESR because of transformer or diode ESR.
Jan
Not ignoring it, just that it's not so important in this case since the end use is a guitar amp not hi-fi, but your point is well taken 😀
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Live Sound
- Instruments and Amps
- PSUD2 question