If not amperage to Ampere, then not voltage to Volt? I do believe amperage is sloppy though. FWIW, I also don't feel right saying orientate.
Actually I may have been trying too hard, I don't think volt needs capitalisation. (capitalisation? 
) I guess I was just thinking of Count Volta 🙂
) I guess I was just thinking of Count Volta 🙂symantics aside, thanks for the advice. If any of you guys feel like taking a look at my load line questions it would be apreciated:
load line question
load line question
That's a tricky one. Many units are named in honour of the pioneer in that field (such as Gauss, or Weber) and we normally capitalise units named after people (as opposed to abstract units like metres or inches). It appears that once a unit has become a generic, it is acceptable for it to lose the mark of respect that capitalisation confers.
hee hee - a great thread meander. Always late to the party, I know 🙄 (It's nice to see that everyone's so good-natured around here).
I got stumped the other day thinking of the right word for this one:
If sight is "visable"
and sound is "audible"
then smell is... "?"
I got stumped the other day thinking of the right word for this one:
If sight is "visable"
and sound is "audible"
then smell is... "?"
Well according to this literary discussion forum, the word "smellable" acutally exists even if used rarely. Dittio "olifactible" -- well done!
"Odourous" didn't get much of a gurnsey, though I feel I've heard it used more.
I wonder if the smell of a burning tube qualifies as "mephitic"? 😛
"Odourous" didn't get much of a gurnsey, though I feel I've heard it used more.
I wonder if the smell of a burning tube qualifies as "mephitic"? 😛
- Status
- Not open for further replies.