Problem with BIB-165K sim

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm working on BIB Fostex FF165K sim, but I have some problems, or missuderstanding.
When I put T/S data into BIB_166_GM_v2 sheat , I get L=168,31 in. and Sm=93.50 sq.in. (more that on Zilla site - Sm=88.125 sq.in.)
If I shorten L and change Fr to 50Hz, then Sm become bigger (Sm=116.87 sq.in.)
What I'm doing wrong?
How to calculate shorter pipe?
I think that Sm must be the same - not bigger if pipe L shorten?
 

Attachments

  • bib_165k_big.png
    bib_165k_big.png
    11.6 KB · Views: 273
Greets!

It takes 'x' amount of net volume (Vb) per Hz of gain BW and when you shorten it you're reducing Vb, so the wall angle and base area must increase to offset the loss in pipe loading. IOW no matter what Fp you choose, the net Vb stays the same whether tall and narrow or short and wide, though there's a point at both extremes where the simple math returns an unacceptably performing alignment.

GM
 
Hi Greg,
I'm realy surprised with the graph you attached, because it is so different to the graph on Zilla site.
It seems that this driver is not a good candidate for BIB enclosure.
 

Attachments

  • bib-165k.png
    bib-165k.png
    42.7 KB · Views: 230
Greets!

I was too and frankly knew that I'd screwed up, but due to a variety of factors beyond my control at the time I couldn't find it, so posted it anyway figuring Scott would review/correct as required since he gets up in an earlier time zone, but he didn't.

Anyway, I found my multiple inputting errors:

GM
 

Attachments

  • ff165k t.c. bib 25 hz fp.gif
    ff165k t.c. bib 25 hz fp.gif
    8 KB · Views: 210
Yeah, it just has a little more tuning flexibility. Indeed, might as well just use TC's 'stock' height/driver location:

L = ~138"
Sm = ~113.873"^2 (~8.973" W x 12.69" D)
a-b-c = ~6.345"
zdriver = ~29.949"

GM
 

Attachments

  • ff165k in 'stock' height t.c. bib.gif
    ff165k in 'stock' height t.c. bib.gif
    8.1 KB · Views: 179
Sorry guys & particularly Greg. I thought there was something wrong, but I didn't have time to look into it this morning, as I needed to get over to Salford to meet some Pakistani naval commanders. Glad it's sorted out though. The 165 really does have a bit of magic in this load, despite the limited Xmax. Not one for belting out Iron Maiden, but if you like acoustic music in particular, you're laughing.
 
😀 Now now...

(OK, not quite the USN, or even the RN. But they've got a pretty good record -they're not a blue-water force at present, though that might change slowly over the next couple of decades.).

God knows I make enough mistakes. I'd worry if I didn't. Blame the computer Greg. It's what I do. 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.