Pot Core inductor DIY

You divide the required inductance by the specified Al value of the potcore, take the square root, and then that's the required number of turns.

For example, for 1 H required inductance and Al = 400 nH/turn2:

√(1/400E-9) = √(2500 000) ~= 1581 turns.

You will need a really big core and coil former and very thin wire for that many turns. You could also go for an ungapped core, those are available with higher Al values, but they are inaccurate and quite nonlinear.
 
You divide the required inductance by the specified Al value of the potcore, take the square root, and then that's the required number of turns.

For example, for 1 H required inductance and Al = 400 nH/turn2:

√(1/400E-9) = √(2500 000) ~= 1581 turns.

You will need a really big core and coil former and very thin wire for that many turns. You could also go for an ungapped core, those are available with higher Al values, but they are inaccurate and quite nonlinear.
Unfornually I need accuracy and lineraity. I can get a potcore with an Al of 4500 I saw
 
If the AL really is 4000nH then that would indicate an ungapped core with 25% or greater tolerance for its AL number. So seems unlikely that Marchand is using that AL, perhaps its a typo for AL=400 which is a practical value with a very small gap and likely around 5% tolerance.

0.06mm is quite practical with some experience and gentle handling. Assuming that is that the DCR (or Q) isn't too much of an issue. If it is, a bigger core is called for.

The cores in your link are ungapped - how to tell is the AL numbers are in the thousands and have 25% tolerance which isn't too practical for creating filters for audio crossovers.
 
If the AL really is 4000nH then that would indicate an ungapped core with 25% or greater tolerance for its AL number. So seems unlikely that Marchand is using that AL, perhaps its a typo for AL=400 which is a practical value with a very small gap and likely around 5% tolerance.

0.06mm is quite practical with some experience and gentle handling. Assuming that is that the DCR (or Q) isn't too much of an issue. If it is, a bigger core is called for.

The cores in your link are ungapped - how to tell is the AL numbers are in the thousands and have 25% tolerance which isn't too practical for creating filters for audio crossovers

In their calculator the mention AL=4000, but 25% tolerance seems to be to much for an XO I guess.
 
Last edited:
I downloaded the Marchand 'calculator.exe' program, it does default to AL=4000 when the XM46 is selected. However that number is user editable. Perhaps some users don't care much about the tolerance of their PLLXO so are happy to design with ungapped cores?
 
Mouser stocked them last time I looked but I just checked and now they only have ungapped ones. Send me a PM, I might be able to help out.

Looking again, I can see gapped cores on Mouser now, for example : https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/EPCOS-TDK/B65671T0400A048?qs=/sLciWRBLmCe%2BJUr9kG6gg==. I've never been able to work out whether the item is a pair or just a half core and also what other accessories I would need to order to get a finished inductor.
 
Something to consider is the use: if it's for signal applications (~line level) you don't need to worry about the maximum induction, but if it is used in a crossover filter or other large signal/current application, you need to make sure that the induction doesn't reach the saturation level