• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Polyprops as cathode bypass

Status
Not open for further replies.
It depends on who you ask! I've used polypropylenes and polyester metal films to bypass electrolytic cathode caps. Never used films exclusively. It SEEMED to improve (placebo effect maybe?) and other times not. Try it yourself and let your own ears be the judge. It's your amp! And your money, hehe! 😉

Wayne😎
 
s2kov said:
Would there any advantage using or adding polyprop caps on cathode bypass? What sonic difference will i get?

No...

Especially considering they'll be as big as the amp itself.

Oops, shouldn't have mentioned that 🙄

Tim

(Which reminds me, who here has added lead weights to improve the power to weight ratio? Anyone? Raise your hand...*loads shotgun*)
(And yes I'm in an evil mood today)
 
Would there any advantage using or adding polyprop caps on cathode bypass? What sonic difference will i get?


The answer to your question depends on the general quality of your perception and whether you like the sonic effect of bypassing caps or not. I would usually recommend using the best sounding cap you can afford on its own but many times bypassing is a good compromise.

What seems to make a bigger improvement, if your circuit allows it, is to replace the cathode bypass with an 'ultracap' connection.
 
Hi,

What sonic difference will i get?

Use a good quality cap but do not mix various technologies together hoping to make a decent sounding cap out of crap.

Bypassing electrolytic caps often causes more problems than it cures IMO.

What seems to make a bigger improvement, if your circuit allows it, is to replace the cathode bypass with an 'ultracap' connection.

Whazzz that? Or do you mean "Ultrapath"?

Cheers,😉
 
Hi frank, you mean using both electrolytic and polyprop caps connected in parallel to use as bypass cap will only cause problem? Can you point me a sample ultrapath circuit and what advantage will i get with it.


Guys, thanks for all your inputs.🙂
 
Hi,

Hi frank, you mean using both electrolytic and polyprop caps connected in parallel to use as bypass cap will only cause problem?

Yes, that's what I mean.

Connecting a bunch of small value caps to make a big one is also tricky in that it leads to stray inductance which can turn into nasty resonances.

Cheers,😉
 
Seriously I don't generally (directly) bypass my electrolytic caps. I try to use good quality electrolytic caps in the first place. Now say I have a 100uF cap in the pwr supply that's located a good distance away from the circuit it's associated with, I may use a 100nF - 1uF polypropylene bypass mounted close to the associated circuit. After reading stuff saying BYPASS all your nasty sounding electrolytic caps, I've tried it many times. In most cases the resulting sound was either worse (harsh sounding, probably due to unwanted resonances) or had no effect at all.
Bypassing cathode caps in my humble experience seemed to improve the sound (in a few cases) only when that location was where NFB was applied in pre-amplifiers such as in phono preamps. Even the lowly polyester film cap sounded better in some cases(???). Go figure! So in general there's really no sonic benefit in doing so! Best to use high quality electrolytics to begin with, using a good layout! 😀 I must agree with Frank on this one!

Wayne 😉
 
I remember when I replaced the stock internal 'lytic 22uF coupling caps in my Lux MB3045's with polypropes of the same value - in particular, I noticed that the bass became quite noticeably cleaner and less buzzy as a result - which is probably to be expected since that is where the capacitor's impedance begins to affect open loop phase shift and its nonlinearities can express themselves to the greatest extent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.