pioneer ts-w303r 12" subwoofer

[xeclipse]

Hi guys,
I am debating wheather to purchase this sub.The specs are quite tempting for a midium power sub.Has anyone ever used this before?How accurate are the specs?
Claimed specs:
rms 250 watts (max.1200 W)
sensitivity 95 db
frequency response 20-180hz.
Regards

 

[aerocell]

Hi, I actually just put a TS-W3004SPL into my sub box just to get an idea of what it would sound like as I am about to build a new box for it.
The box it is in is too small for it but even so it sounds really really good, it dops very low, so I can say it will sound even better when its in the new box.

Here is the manual that its shipped with, maybe it will help you decide.

http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/StaticFiles/Manuals/Car/TS-W303R_InstallationManual0522.pdf

And this is the one that I am using,(if you want to make a comparison) I actually have two of these.🙂

http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pio/pe/images/portal/cit_11221/217888139TRD1263-A_UC.pdf

I hope this is of some help to you.

 

[GM]

FYI: the published specs are ambiguous at best since its Mms, Cms, Rms, BL calculates considerably different Fs, Qts, specs to the point where the latter dictates a near doubling of cab net Vb, so short of measuring them, using a sealed alignment based on its Fs, Vas, Qts seems a reasonable choice; but at ~16.8 ft^3 seems a bit much considering its Xmax severely limits its low distortion peak SPL down low if there's not a significant amount of room gain like one gets in a typical vehicle.

GM

 

[bjorno]

FYI: the published specs are ambiguous at best since its Mms, Cms, Rms, BL calculates considerably different Fs, Qts, specs to the point where the latter dictates a near doubling of cab net Vb, so short of measuring them, using a sealed alignment based on its Fs, Vas, Qts seems a reasonable choice; but at ~16.8 ft^3 seems a bit much considering its Xmax severely limits its low distortion peak SPL down low if there's not a significant amount of room gain like one gets in a typical vehicle.

GM

Agree, I found more believable T/S data..?.. that I tried to use for use in a T-TQWT 🙂. See the plotted simulation results in the picture:

b