2012 is a clear indication that you haven't been around here long enough to know.
Not much of a difference, relatively speaking, but I was implying the latter.
The good Ol' days : www.hiendy.com/hififorum/data/attachment/forum/month_1110/11102402027b3f95a92e632a30.jpg
(and long after exvented, likely)
Last edited:
I think we could probably know the exact schematic and not get it to sound like the Xs. There is more to it than part on a schematic. F6 should have taught you that. HAve you built yours yet? IT is really nice amp. Own peculiar but attractive sound. So many variables in such a simple amp. I get discouraged thinking about how many variables are in Xs. How long has he been prototyping this one?
sole reason for that thickness is simple - Pa's tooling isn't sissy enough for sissy thickness
sissy means precise
ya remember custom milling machines from A75 articolo ?
sissy means precise
ya remember custom milling machines from A75 articolo ?
Paw-Wow is probably more like an X-rated producer.
Hasn't finished one flic, but already reading new scripts and oil-checking new stars on the ornament, in his tipi.
Oh sorry, I meant hold auditions. (English so difficult, and I shouldn't watch Debbie does Phoenix while typing)
Last edited:
oh boy ..... why is socio(pathic) side of musical business so amusing ......
( at least for worst among attendees )
( at least for worst among attendees )
Checking oil in Xs thread. Thats interesting perspective on amp building.
It iz an important part of DIY audio porn.... Most of the toyz we build require extensive probing of test points to make sure the operating parameters pass the smell test.... 😀😀😀
(where iz that damn skunk at??? sniff-sniff)😱
Also goes for blue-t oil.
(As this is among friendlies : some assume that swapping a line around and exchanging a word is for the sake of accuracy. While the poster merely wondered, for amusement sake, how many lines it would take to induce an ostentatious response instead of a pragmatic one. Only 1, the initial main topic in the example case was to learn by the ability to admit wrongs.
)
Zen Mod; where did you find the underlined in the Xs literature or elswhere?observe closer - main boards are in 2 floors
edit : just remembering mentioning of those "modulated cascodes" makes me feel a little hysteric
Papa somewhere mention them , in broader context
are they in XS or not , I don't know
at least not certainly
edit: and yes , I still feel hysteric whenever modulated cascode drop me on the scull
are they in XS or not , I don't know
at least not certainly
edit: and yes , I still feel hysteric whenever modulated cascode drop me on the scull
Last edited:
Also goes for blue-t oil.
(As this is among friendlies : some assume that swapping a line around and exchanging a word is for the sake of accuracy. While the poster merely wondered, for amusement sake, how many lines it would take to induce an ostentatious response instead of a pragmatic one. Only 1, the initial main topic in the example case was to learn by the ability to admit wrongs.
Jacco,
You make me think to much.
just don't take him too seriously
at least I'm not doing that
(I'm lazy , so just imagine that I attached those smoochsmooch pics below )
at least I'm not doing that
(I'm lazy , so just imagine that I attached those smoochsmooch pics below )
- Status
- Not open for further replies.