hi i got 4 x amp camp kits the question is ? what would sound better or possibly slightly louder bridged with the help of a drv434 or paralell
isn't that covered , lately , in ACA thread ?
however , more info about load and sources , if you expect any sort of proper reply
however , more info about load and sources , if you expect any sort of proper reply
Bridged will have 6db more gain.
You don't need to run a bridge driver, the ACA can do it by itself.
You don't need to run a bridge driver, the ACA can do it by itself.
in your well seasoned personal preference wich has the best sound quality ? bridged or paralell ?
In my experience, with my speakers, in my room, to my musical tastes, on days that end in 'y', etc... I prefer bridged fed by the RCAs.
Hmm so parallel will probably sound better in my part of the world as there are no days ending with 'y' only 'ur' or 'g' 😉...on days that end in 'y', etc... I prefer bridged fed by the RCAs.
Last edited:
In theory, yes, but at that point just build a bigger amp... 😀
F5Tv2 in a 5U with 25v transformer will get you 50w 8ohm 100x 4ohm and likely be cheaper.
F5Tv2 in a 5U with 25v transformer will get you 50w 8ohm 100x 4ohm and likely be cheaper.
You really need to consider the load you will be driving. In bridged mode each channel will see half the impedance you you need to ensure that the amp is capable of driving the load.
With parallel, AFAIK< the amp sees the full load? Or does it look like double the impedance?
dave
With parallel, AFAIK< the amp sees the full load? Or does it look like double the impedance?
dave
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- paralell or bridged