Some questions to be answered:
- Heat dissipation in the PCB? Well, all of the losses are not situated in the FETs so at 150W into 8 ohm we have to get rid of about 5W in the FETs. Without the mounting bracket this will not be possible continuously but only for about 30s before it shuts down. With music, it will not be a problem as the average power is only 1/8 of 150W so you can easily run the module at "full" power with music both into 8 ohms and 4 ohms.
- Patented hysteresis modulator? No, it is not the modulator that is patented. I have changed the text in order to avoid confusion.
- THD at high frequencies? We can certainly lower THD+N to below 0,02% at 6,67kHz but at the expense of lower efficiency and much higher idle losses. In my opinion a class d amplifier should have really low losses, otherwise you loose one of the key features. Extensive listening tests has shown that lowering THD+N below 0,05% at 6,67kHz does not improve the sound quality further.
- Heat dissipation in the PCB? Well, all of the losses are not situated in the FETs so at 150W into 8 ohm we have to get rid of about 5W in the FETs. Without the mounting bracket this will not be possible continuously but only for about 30s before it shuts down. With music, it will not be a problem as the average power is only 1/8 of 150W so you can easily run the module at "full" power with music both into 8 ohms and 4 ohms.
- Patented hysteresis modulator? No, it is not the modulator that is patented. I have changed the text in order to avoid confusion.
- THD at high frequencies? We can certainly lower THD+N to below 0,02% at 6,67kHz but at the expense of lower efficiency and much higher idle losses. In my opinion a class d amplifier should have really low losses, otherwise you loose one of the key features. Extensive listening tests has shown that lowering THD+N below 0,05% at 6,67kHz does not improve the sound quality further.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.