I see now that there seems to be some automatic
function compressing spaces, so all the equations I tried to
make look nice turned out entirely wrong. Yet another reason
to hate all Microsoftish software. Hope you can make sense
out of it anyway, putting the numerators and denominators
back into their proper place.
function compressing spaces, so all the equations I tried to
make look nice turned out entirely wrong. Yet another reason
to hate all Microsoftish software. Hope you can make sense
out of it anyway, putting the numerators and denominators
back into their proper place.
Take a snapshot
Than capture the window of the editor.
I use XnView freeware - it can capture in tree ways:
desktop, window, work space in a window
I usually save the capture in "Xxxxxxx.gif"
but the default is something "Capture.92i"
Then you attach your image to your post.
You can write down the fourmulas in an text editor.Christer said:I see now that there seems to be some automatic
function compressing spaces, so all the equations I tried to
make look nice turned out entirely wrong. Yet another reason
to hate all Microsoftish software. Hope you can make sense
out of it anyway, putting the numerators and denominators
back into their proper place.
Than capture the window of the editor.
I use XnView freeware - it can capture in tree ways:
desktop, window, work space in a window
I usually save the capture in "Xxxxxxx.gif"
but the default is something "Capture.92i"
Then you attach your image to your post.
Halojoy,
yes, I was considering posting it as a picture, but I decided to
make the whole text a zip file instead.
The text of my previous posting is attached as a pure text file
so it can be viewed by any program with normal behaviour.
You may have to specify a fixed-width font, though, to make
it appear as intended. I really should typeset it in LaTex to
make it nice, but I am not sure the text is of that much use to
anyone that it is worth it.
yes, I was considering posting it as a picture, but I decided to
make the whole text a zip file instead.
The text of my previous posting is attached as a pure text file
so it can be viewed by any program with normal behaviour.
You may have to specify a fixed-width font, though, to make
it appear as intended. I really should typeset it in LaTex to
make it nice, but I am not sure the text is of that much use to
anyone that it is worth it.
Attachments
Re: Re: Re: Re: What is the fault in my Calculator?
Yeah, fair! 🙂
-Dan
janneman said:
Yeah, you're right, but you are using j in that, which was what we were trying to get the root of in the first place. Not fair!😉
Jan Didden
Yeah, fair! 🙂
-Dan
Re: Re: Re: Re: What is the fault in my Calculator?
Ahhhh, you are quite right! Both j and -j squared equil -1... ...Slipped my mind!
Hear that Jan? There are two numbers you can square to get -1 🙂
traderbam: Good show! Exactly what I was thinking, but was way too lazy to type out!
-Dan
UrSv said:
And -j of course which squared gives -1. Or i and -i as in maths as I think j is used for physics/electronics mainly. Confusing to say the least. It does exist however.
The solution to SQRT(-1) is thus j and -j.
/UrSv
Ahhhh, you are quite right! Both j and -j squared equil -1... ...Slipped my mind!
Hear that Jan? There are two numbers you can square to get -1 🙂
traderbam: Good show! Exactly what I was thinking, but was way too lazy to type out!
-Dan
Ok, Ok, but I still think it isn't fair!
What you did is say:
"Let's define a number j, which for the sake of discussion we call sqroot of -1".
"OK"
"Aha! See! There exists a number that we can square and will give -1!"
Jan Didden😀
What you did is say:
"Let's define a number j, which for the sake of discussion we call sqroot of -1".
"OK"
"Aha! See! There exists a number that we can square and will give -1!"
Jan Didden😀
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Opamp low-pass roll-off question