AndrewT loves the monoblocs for a few reasons a good engineer won't admit to; but, ima spill the beans: You get a hella lot better 3d like imaging and lot more slammin good bass. Got it?
Hi,
I made schematic from Mark, thank's..
Amp is almost finished, attach cables, wiring pot and connectors, tomorrow..
Phil.
I made schematic from Mark, thank's..
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Amp is almost finished, attach cables, wiring pot and connectors, tomorrow..
Phil.
I am planning to build my amp with exactly same scheme.
I think although signalGND is common, two channels are separated and there will be no ground loop. the earth breaker circuit per channel in same chasis is not wrong, isn't it?
How much he likes the sound.
Usually the communication is the opposite, as in percentages off the ideal. That's really very useful up until you'd like to know what sounds good and then, and then? And then we'd need to have a whole lot more complicated discussion about fitting the transmission suitably to the receiver.
A dual-mono amplifier is to be made exactly as monoblocks except sharing one chassis. So, it is only the chassis ground (and earth ground) that is the commoned.
If the signal ground was commoned at the amplifier enclosure, then that defines a stereo amplifier, not a dual-mono amplifier.
The limiting factor in defining a dual-mono amplifier is: Two Mono Amplifiers. Therefore, signal inputs aren't commoned for reference point.
It seems that separate left and right channel ground loop breakers are required to meet my definition of a dual mono amplifier. I hadn't thought of that before. Thanks for your help.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.