here is another P3A related question
What can be done to achive an input imp. of about 100K without altering the safety status of the amplifier ?
Idea is that with 100k input the amp is going to be way too friendly for passive preamps and/or make a wonderfull pair with B1 buffer ....
kind regards sakis
ot remind the schematic
What can be done to achive an input imp. of about 100K without altering the safety status of the amplifier ?
Idea is that with 100k input the amp is going to be way too friendly for passive preamps and/or make a wonderfull pair with B1 buffer ....
kind regards sakis
ot remind the schematic
R2=100k
R5=100k
R4=4.7k
C3=22uF
would keep the dc-offset and gain, but make input impedance 100k
C1 could also be lower ~1uF or 2.2uF
R5=100k
R4=4.7k
C3=22uF
would keep the dc-offset and gain, but make input impedance 100k
C1 could also be lower ~1uF or 2.2uF
I recommend similar. Just a few minor adjustments.
C1=1uF & R1=100k.
R5=100k, R4=4k7, C3>=33uF.
C2 & R3 adjust to taste.
C1=1uF & R1=100k.
R5=100k, R4=4k7, C3>=33uF.
C2 & R3 adjust to taste.
yeap this was my approach too ...
a) please comment on the idea
b) please comment regarding theissue of safety IE anyone things that this might effect stability of the amp?
thanks for your help
sakis
a) please comment on the idea
b) please comment regarding theissue of safety IE anyone things that this might effect stability of the amp?
thanks for your help
sakis
I don't recognise any safety issue by substituting any of those component values.
Line2 of post3 shows R1=100k. This must be changed to R2=100k. Sorry.
Just noticed you posted an ESP schematic.
Ask him first.
Line2 of post3 shows R1=100k. This must be changed to R2=100k. Sorry.
Just noticed you posted an ESP schematic.
Ask him first.
The particular schematic is not protected .... its free in the internet ...
Thanks for your help Andrew .
kind regards sakis
Thanks for your help Andrew .
kind regards sakis
Go and read ESP site.
One of the conditions of using the information he provides freely, is that you agree to not reproduce his drawings as you have done in your post.
One of the conditions of using the information he provides freely, is that you agree to not reproduce his drawings as you have done in your post.
i apologize for that probably i have been reading it but dont remember
Moderators please remove my post or schematic .
Thanks Andrew for the notice .
Kind regards sakis
Moderators please remove my post or schematic .
Thanks Andrew for the notice .
Kind regards sakis
Bootstrap
Or, to keep the amplifier running as present, you could bootstrap the input as per Self's illustration. Chapter 4 in the current 5th edition of his Audio Power Amp. Design Handbook. I haven't tried it but this should keep internal noise at present level while matching to the higher impedance set by the resistive divider added at the input. ..... BTW, It's also part of the trimodal amplifier, if your edition is earlier.
Or, to keep the amplifier running as present, you could bootstrap the input as per Self's illustration. Chapter 4 in the current 5th edition of his Audio Power Amp. Design Handbook. I haven't tried it but this should keep internal noise at present level while matching to the higher impedance set by the resistive divider added at the input. ..... BTW, It's also part of the trimodal amplifier, if your edition is earlier.
Last edited:
ok ...thanks all for the replies ...will make some tests and get back to u
kind regards sakis.
( idea originates from kenwood 5700 . Had one repaired some days ago and this amp features a total passive "preamp" just a switch input selector obviously amplifier board with some increased gain and an input of 100K ... that actually completes the picture )
as about the tone control ( which is not an issue here ) is standing also passive on the feedback node ....
only active thingy is the phono stage of the amp ...
thanks sakis
kind regards sakis.
( idea originates from kenwood 5700 . Had one repaired some days ago and this amp features a total passive "preamp" just a switch input selector obviously amplifier board with some increased gain and an input of 100K ... that actually completes the picture )
as about the tone control ( which is not an issue here ) is standing also passive on the feedback node ....
only active thingy is the phono stage of the amp ...
thanks sakis
As the previous poster pointed to, there is a reason amps no longer have very high input impedances... the selfnoise of high ohmage resistors. It may be more forgiving in old (valve) systems etc. Due to the ability to lift the signal amplitude way above the noise floor.
As the previous poster pointed to, there is a reason amps no longer have very high input impedances... the selfnoise of high ohmage resistors. It may be more forgiving in old (valve) systems etc. Due to the ability to lift the signal amplitude way above the noise floor.
correct i think but still amps with input of 22-47k if driven with a passive pot obviously have absense of dynamics when used in low power ...( that will be average casual listening )
Testings with B1 Nelson Pass buffer had better behaviour but not actually the best .
Best was so far the Death of Zen but still passive is the cleanest you will ever get .
Kind regards sakis
P3A has about 2mA tail current;
If the imput devices have Hfe of 200 , they will drain about 5uA base current
through the 100K biaising resistors , that will see a 500mV voltage drop.
Thus , if the input biaising resistor and the feedback resistor have 5%
tolerance mismatch, this will create a 25mV DC output offset.
The solution is either to use higher gain input transistors with beta of about 500
at least , or to reduce the biaising resistors values , wich is precisely what has
done Rod Elliott , to reduce their voltage drops and consequently input
and feedback tolerance mismatches.
If the imput devices have Hfe of 200 , they will drain about 5uA base current
through the 100K biaising resistors , that will see a 500mV voltage drop.
Thus , if the input biaising resistor and the feedback resistor have 5%
tolerance mismatch, this will create a 25mV DC output offset.
The solution is either to use higher gain input transistors with beta of about 500
at least , or to reduce the biaising resistors values , wich is precisely what has
done Rod Elliott , to reduce their voltage drops and consequently input
and feedback tolerance mismatches.
Use well selected devices for the input LTP pair and the input offset current will be very low. I would not expect any competent builder to select his input components so that they alone gave a 25mV output offset. A little work can easily get that down below 10mV and with care down below 2mV over a wide range of operating conditions. Some builders can achieve +-0.5mV of output offset.
Who uses unmeasured 5% resistors around an LTP pair?
Who uses unmeasured 5% resistors around an LTP pair?
correct i think but still amps with input of 22-47k if driven with a passive pot obviously have absense of dynamics when used in low power ...( that will be average casual listening )
Testings with B1 Nelson Pass buffer had better behaviour but not actually the best .
Best was so far the Death of Zen but still passive is the cleanest you will ever get .
Kind regards sakis
Lol, I am of the no buffer, no preamp brigade. I ripped up just about every pre I ever made and eventualy just left the potentiometer and input selector in the box....
Who uses unmeasured 5% resistors around an LTP pair?
Not always a matter of tolerance..
In the original schematic , there s a built in 10% mismatch, but with 22K
resistors, it matters less than with 100K.
Straight replacement by 100K ones would create 2.2% mismatch.
60-80W Power Amplifier
Most builders have at least one resistance meter.
It's easy to compare resistor values in the range 10k to 200k.
There is no excuse for not measuring resistors. Stating 2.2% mismatch is equivalent to the production engineering done to minimise cost vs performance for cheap product coming off the mass production line.
DIYaudio can do 10 times better, if they try.
It's easy to compare resistor values in the range 10k to 200k.
There is no excuse for not measuring resistors. Stating 2.2% mismatch is equivalent to the production engineering done to minimise cost vs performance for cheap product coming off the mass production line.
DIYaudio can do 10 times better, if they try.
Use well selected devices for the input LTP pair and the input offset current will be very low.
Yes.hFE mismatch can cause a difference in input bias current
and so additional offset difference
Neither resistor tolerance nor resistor value are the offset issue.
Input offset current and methods to reduce that are the issue for resource strapped builders.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- ONE MORE P3A QUESTION