Old steel to-3 to ansistors vs new semiconductor pluses and minuses

So I encounter various equipment. Often i see steel transistors (to-3 I believe) on
Old pioneers. Encapsulated in flat steel cylinder.

And new black or green colored semiconductor transistors. Rectangular shape

What are benefits of each type of output transistor. Ive heard to-3 steel type are unreliable and can leak .. easily stressed.

It's one major reason i am always selling or avoiding old amps with those to-3 types of transistors

And would prefer nakamichi pa-7 over threshold s300 or whichever one was copied by nakamichi. I think s300 used old steel output transistors
 
So steel encapsulation isn't really indicative of the material used Inside

Did they make rectangular output transistors with small heat sink of the same simiconductor type as those encapsulated in steel cylinders?

What's the purpose of steel encapsulation. Heat dissipation?

And why did industry moved from steel encapsulated transistors to rectangular . Rectangular with heat plate is easier to install looks like
 
I see.

Now the hot question.

Output transistor quality and reliability on threshold s300 vs on nakamichi pa-7

I really want to know truthful scientifically backed answer.

Without any patronizingly polite general statements that avoid the truth. I know it's pass labs forum so it's sort of a little tribe of passophiles who worship to nelson pass. This may be a slightly overblown metaphor. Just few times when I expressed my opinion about garbage adcom amplifiers(and this cannot be debated, as they are made from scrap metal, no dc relay+ long track record of these amps blowing speakers up)I often got retorts from few emotionally charged members trying to be hero and defend the papa nelson pass as if I am attacking him physically.
Stasis is a great idea. But implementation reliability and parts quality is different.



S300

Output MJ15012 and MJ15011
Drivers MJ15022 and MJ15023

Found this info online


"I since studied into the circuit and look at the transistors. The PA-7 uses 2SA1294 and 2SC3263 output transistor which are still up to date for modern design. They are faster(35MHz+)than most of the transistors used in today's amp. The Threshold S/300 uses MJ15022 and MJ15023 type of old transistors that is only 1/10 the speed of the transistors used in PA-7. PA-7 definitely have superior parts than the equal Threshold.
"

Source:

Audio Asylum Thread Printer
 
Last edited:
well, Nelson didn't build Adcom amps, so why should I bother

regarding speed of transistors, besides historical facts - when amplifier was made and what were available types then (take in account that those were days of things happening fast) , I'm not overly concerned with that.......... once when transistor is fast enough for my needs, I don't care how much faster it can be ..... except in cases - that resulting in headache (problems)

in most cases people without damn clue how to make an amplifier are most productive in making myths

and, of those who are capable to make own amplifier, 9 of 10 are not having a damn clue what's needed to make a product and sell it

I can bet that there are more functional S300 than PA-7 ........ :clown:
 
I agree. Lots of myths on internet

This forum has lots of good legitimate posters. Reliable sources.

One other thing I've read online pa-7 runs hot and has reliability issues due to that heat

Pa-7 ii fixed the heat issue.. but then there is this another internet rumor to get the original pa-7 not the pa-7ii

I might want to get pa-7 or 5 down the line. Years ahead. So collecting information.

I don't blast music loud. But currently using polk sda-crs+. In future might want to run 4 of them for a more moving and impactful presentation of some classical pieces

Not sure if ta-4a will be enough to run them connected in series. Sda-crs+ tend to be power hungry. 2 6.5" drivers + 1 tweeter. 89-90db efficiency. 6ohm impedance

Now I use one pair with ta-4a and 9-10 o'clock volume level max