• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

NOS TUBES

As far as I know these are TV tubes with limited audio use. The EF184 could be used in a preamp or the first stages of an amp, in pentode or triode. It's a good tube in triode. In an amp it would be followed by a bigger tube with more currant. Not a useful driver in itself unless you use a cathode/source follower. Maybe you have some other tubes or just these three types?
 
I lay may hands on a very good amount of some quality tubes

EF184 made by EDICRON
ECH 84 made by RCA
PCF 802 made by pHILIPS

Can any one suggest audio circuits that operate good with these tubes ?
ef184 will du fine in riaa
pcf802 is similar to 7199 / 6u8 / ecf82 with a different filament voltage ( 9 volt). Could be used as amplifier/phase inverter a la dynaco MkIII
 
Hi andy you wrote about EF184 in triode connection

'Not a useful driver in itself unless you use a cathode/source follower.'

My 300B se class A output stage is driven by choke loaded EF184, 180volt at plate 2.5volt at cathode, 10ma cathode current cap coupled to 300B grid and it gives me wonderful sound. In this config u is more than 50 and internal plate resistance is about 3k. Please note I also have used E810F and E180F to drive the same output stage. All three are very nice 300b driver.

Regards
 
Mixed sets of E and P tubes were very common in those days! ECC 81, ECC 82, EF 80, EF 85 and the aformentioned ECH 84 and EF 184 (and some more) lived happily next to PL 81's, PL 36's, PL 504's etc.

Best regards!
I've never come to see a mixed heater set of tubes in gear, not one in more than four decades.
Please let us all know, where they have been used.
I mean, tell us, which gear (manufacturer and model number) they have been employed.
If they were so common, as you said, why did it make sense?
They use different PSU and the P- tubes, we all know, were used in TV sets and not in audio amps. And thats for some reason.
So why should they mix them up?
 
Last edited:
I'm not talking about DIY and the today prices.
I'm talking about the times, when this kind of tubes were used in all kind of commercial gear.

And with that, it makes absolute no sense to use E- and P- heater tubes in one set of tubes.
Either you design a for a set of P- heater tubes or you design the gear for a set of E- heater tubes.
For you, it may differ only in some euros to use both.
In a series production with some hundred thousand pieces, nobody does that for no reason. Even when it only cost some cents more.
And I don't see that P- tubes were generally cheaper those days.
 
Last edited:
I've never come to see a mixed heater set of tubes in gear, not one in more than four decades.
Please let us all know, where they have been used.
I mean, tell us, which gear (manufacturer and model number) they have been employed.
If they were so common, as you said, why did it make sense?
They use different PSU and the P- tubes, we all know, were used in TV sets and not in audio amps. And thats for some reason.
So why should they mix them up?
It's nothing strange here, ECC81/82/83 draws 300mA and is thus usable in a P-series filament string. In fact there was never any PCC83

At the same time PCC88 is usable with 6.3V filament.