NEZ Amplifier (The Yin Yang of ZEN)

This simple single ended amplifier could serve as a complement to the well-known ZEN, both for its extreme simplicity and for its quality specifications.

As features, I can list:

1) SNR at 1W into 8 ohms = 87.71 dB (1 KHz)

2) I bias = 1.45 A

3) Output impedance = 2.23 ohms (1 KHz)

4) Damping factor at 1 KHz and 8 ohms = 3.57

5) Voltage gain at 1KHz = 12.88 dB (x 4.4)

6) PSRR at 100 Hz = 41.33 dB

7) Supply voltage = 32 VCC aprox.

Two adjust: Offset ("O" trimpot) and I bías ("B" trimpot)

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


Best regards
 

Attachments

  • NEZ Amplifier (Schematic).jpg
    NEZ Amplifier (Schematic).jpg
    152.3 KB · Views: 1,171
  • NEZ Amplifier (THD vs Output Power).jpg
    NEZ Amplifier (THD vs Output Power).jpg
    133.6 KB · Views: 1,110
  • NEZ Amplifier (THD vs Frecuency) at 2W.jpg
    NEZ Amplifier (THD vs Frecuency) at 2W.jpg
    125 KB · Views: 1,109
  • NEZ Amplifier (THD vs Frecuency) at 1W.jpg
    NEZ Amplifier (THD vs Frecuency) at 1W.jpg
    124.7 KB · Views: 1,097
  • NEZ Amplifier (Bode).jpg
    NEZ Amplifier (Bode).jpg
    731 KB · Views: 1,080
  • NEZ Amplifier (PSRR).jpg
    NEZ Amplifier (PSRR).jpg
    231.7 KB · Views: 1,089
Last edited:
Most interesting ! Well done 🙂

Also I guess many will have the same suggestions as I would about biasing of the mu-follower (why not use opto ?) and eliminating the source resistor R4.

But meantime why dont you tell us about R8, R10 and the grounding scheme ?
 
Last edited:
Thank you so much kasey197 !!!

Which scheme would you imagine to suppress R4?

Although the offset (V/2 point) is stable with temperature, the current bias depends somewhat on the supply voltage.

A stabilized voltage is the most advisable for this simple amplifier.

Best regards 🙂
 
Which scheme would you imagine to suppress R4?

I think you could remove both R4 and R6, although increasing C1 might
be helpful. You need good heat sinking and some attention to the
bias over the first hour or so, as it heats up.

Alternatively you can suppress the action of R4 by returning the speaker
(-) to between the Source pin of Q1 and R4.

And remember to put Gate resistors on those Mosfets.....

:snail:
 
Hi. Nice to see you here !!!. This simple amp, like the ones I generally prefer, is single ended. It's more comparable to ZEN than DLH, in many ways, just a little bit easier. With the most recent suggestions offered by Nelson Pass, you can simplify and arrive at an even more economical circuit, without appreciable deterioration of the general parameters (without R4 and R6). I was simulating the simplifications and the results are practically similar to those of the initial circuit (post 1).

Among the mosfets, a wide variety could be tested without major difficulties: IRFP150N, IRFP240N, IRFP044N, etc. Same choice as for ZEN.

Best regards 🙂
 
I think you could remove both R4 and R6, although increasing C1 might
be helpful. You need good heat sinking and some attention to the
bias over the first hour or so, as it heats up.

Alternatively you can suppress the action of R4 by returning the speaker
(-) to between the Source pin of Q1 and R4.

And remember to put Gate resistors on those Mosfets.....

:snail:

I've come up with something like this:

attachment.php


In this scheme, the positive change is the drop in output impedance, which goes from 2.23 ohms to 0.83 ohms, so that the DF increases from 3.57 to 9.55 (@ 1 KHz and 8 ohms).

The rest of the parameters do not change substantially.

I have omitted the gate stoppers, for clarity in the schematic. They should be no more than 470 ohms or slightly less as well.

Thank you very much Nelson!!!
 

Attachments

  • NEZ Amplifier (Simple Schematic).jpg
    NEZ Amplifier (Simple Schematic).jpg
    102.1 KB · Views: 538
Last edited:
Hello Diego. About 2 years ago I did a similar circuit but in SRPP 24W. The problem I could not resolve to perfection is the power supply buzz. I was using a switching power supply that as law requires has a capacitor linking the earth to the output. As the supply is floating, this internal capacitor needs to be isolated by using not single inductance as you did but double on both poles. If you use a toroid transformer it makes the same problem. May be transformer with independent compartments is the best solution, but then it is custom made.

attachment.php

Hayk
 

Attachments

  • FLOATING SRPP .JPG
    FLOATING SRPP .JPG
    40.1 KB · Views: 568
Last edited:
Hello kokoriantz !!!. Nice to see you here. Your circuit is very interesting. Do you have any PSRR curve of your circuit to show, depending on the polarization setting that you consider convenient?

With the PSU I suggested, the noise due to ripple should be on the order of 100 uV approx.

Best regards 🙂
 
It is not the ripple the problem, The hum and buzz that gets on the secondary in reference to ground by capacitance from the primary. It acts as noise generator in parallel to the feedback shunt resistor 180 ohm in yours. Decrease to minimum you can. You need to earth the secondary wires by a pair of 1nf and resistor. The 2mH make it 2× 1mH to be on +&-. The inductor the capacitors and the resistor form a notch comes in parallel to the feedback shunt resistor.
See also the PSU of another floating supply amplifier A260. It uses a shielded transformer, and double CLC.
 

Attachments

  • A260.pdf
    A260.pdf
    782.3 KB · Views: 139
  • supply.JPG
    supply.JPG
    41.4 KB · Views: 220
Last edited: