Newer = Better?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been searching for a high quality amp design/kit for my first project and I've been wondering... Does newer mean better? It seems to me that the class A designs from 1995 should be just about as good as the class A designs from 2011. From what I've read, hardware tolerances may have improved but the nuts and bolts of designing an amp have pretty much stayed the same. Can I also apply that theory to the realm of commercial amps? Is there any reason to think that ultra low distortion class A monoblocks from 20 years ago are any worse than the stuff people are pumping out today?
 
Not a great deal has changed since 1995, although a lot of refinements are now used that were not common then. The components have improved a bit. You may find when building an old design that the parts are hard to find. Unles you have a specific design in mind with specific reasons to build it, newer is better.

For a new project, you might as well use a modern design with modern components. It is not a trivial undertaking, especially in Class A. The actual circuit board is just the start. The heatsinks, case, transformer adds up to quite a pile of cash.
 
Some of PASS designs are still alive and being built from before 1995.
Self's Blameless dates from about the same time.
When did Cordell design his 50W FET amp?

Design does change that much over 16years.

BTW,
the PCB might account for <5% of the amp cost.
The amp itself maybe another 5%.
The big costs are Case/chassis (~30%), PSU (~30%) heatsinks & hardware (~30%) if you are buying everything new.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.