Hi, newbie here, sortof... not sure where to post this, way too many subforums, heh...
I have a handful of small generic speakers & while they aren't showstoppers, I would like to Optimize their sound by building a cab around them. Can someone point me to some places that will give me correction calculations of dimensions (LxWxH)? Perhaps that is all I will need to do at my stage of knowledge/experience, i.e. build a PROPER cabinet, install speaker, then straight wire them up to an amp sound source. I have built a speaker before but that was in the late 1980's.
Here are the speakers in question:
- 3.0 inch (frame), 4Ω, 8P307TA (there is a logo on speaker but not sure what it is), wattage unknown, smooth silver plastic dustcap, 2 pieces.
- 2.5 inch (frame), 16Ω, no model#, TopToneJapan, 2 pieces (may not use these)
I also have a couple tweeters that if I had time I may also design into the computations:
- DP-Audio DW51 tweeters, crossover built in, impediance unknown, 2 pieces, see Fry's Electronics |
I have actually breadboarded the 3.0-inch speaker & DW51 tweeters last year, in stereo config & I thought they sounded ok, but that was without a cabinet. I realize they may have different impedances, I don't recall what "resistance" I measured of DW51.
I have read the Radio Shack "Building Speaker Systems" (2nd Edition Paperback – 1991) that I read in the early 1990's, but their golden ratio calculations don't go far down into the 2-3 inch speaker sizes, iirc.
Any thoughts? I just want to build a quick cheap (but optimized) PC/shelf speakers out of these items. Thanks. If anyone needs photos of these mystery speakers, I can do that if requested.
I have a handful of small generic speakers & while they aren't showstoppers, I would like to Optimize their sound by building a cab around them. Can someone point me to some places that will give me correction calculations of dimensions (LxWxH)? Perhaps that is all I will need to do at my stage of knowledge/experience, i.e. build a PROPER cabinet, install speaker, then straight wire them up to an amp sound source. I have built a speaker before but that was in the late 1980's.
Here are the speakers in question:
- 3.0 inch (frame), 4Ω, 8P307TA (there is a logo on speaker but not sure what it is), wattage unknown, smooth silver plastic dustcap, 2 pieces.
- 2.5 inch (frame), 16Ω, no model#, TopToneJapan, 2 pieces (may not use these)
I also have a couple tweeters that if I had time I may also design into the computations:
- DP-Audio DW51 tweeters, crossover built in, impediance unknown, 2 pieces, see Fry's Electronics |
I have actually breadboarded the 3.0-inch speaker & DW51 tweeters last year, in stereo config & I thought they sounded ok, but that was without a cabinet. I realize they may have different impedances, I don't recall what "resistance" I measured of DW51.
I have read the Radio Shack "Building Speaker Systems" (2nd Edition Paperback – 1991) that I read in the early 1990's, but their golden ratio calculations don't go far down into the 2-3 inch speaker sizes, iirc.
Any thoughts? I just want to build a quick cheap (but optimized) PC/shelf speakers out of these items. Thanks. If anyone needs photos of these mystery speakers, I can do that if requested.
Multiply the advertised diameter by 1.1, then cube that; this will be a workable volume. Don't make H W and D all the same.
3": 3*1.1= 3.3. 3.3^3= 36 cubic inches.
2.5"x3.6"x4" might be convenient.
Panel thickness may be 1/25 of panel width, so 1/8" or 3/16" stuff.
3": 3*1.1= 3.3. 3.3^3= 36 cubic inches.
2.5"x3.6"x4" might be convenient.
Panel thickness may be 1/25 of panel width, so 1/8" or 3/16" stuff.
Multiply the advertised diameter by 1.1, then cube that; this will be a workable volume. Don't make H W and D all the same.
3": 3*1.1= 3.3. 3.3^3= 36 cubic inches.
2.5"x3.6"x4" might be convenient.
Panel thickness may be 1/25 of panel width, so 1/8" or 3/16" stuff.
Thank you for your response (1 person out of 86 views, so I'm grateful). I have some pressboard, I think that's what it's called, or maybe wood paneling, that is 1/4" thick, glossed on 1 side. Would that be ok? It's the only thing I really have just lying around. It's 8" x 48" and with your calculations I really only need about 70 square of it. This is my first build in a long time.
Umm, 2.5" the depth, yes? And I assume 3.6" is width & 4.0" is height.
If I decide to stick those tweeters in there, do the dimension computations change?
Btw, I never really thought the reason why all of the cab sides should never be the same. May I ask why? Something about reverb? I guess I should re-read that Radio Shack book. 🙂
Don't over-think. You want a closed (sealed) box so the back-side radiation does not cancel the front radiation. Not real small or you cramp the bass.
> all of the cab sides should never be the same
Take a paper-towel tube. Clap your hand at the end. The pitch of the "thump" is related (by speed of sound) to the tube length. Same happens between parallel walls. In a box you have the option to not have all three thump-pitches the same. Conventional Wisdom says you should not make them all the same.
Stuffing (for this size, true wool socks or blanket snips work great) damps the thump. A stuffed box will never sound like three towel-rolls.
And several very popular speaker systems are "cubes".
> all of the cab sides should never be the same
Take a paper-towel tube. Clap your hand at the end. The pitch of the "thump" is related (by speed of sound) to the tube length. Same happens between parallel walls. In a box you have the option to not have all three thump-pitches the same. Conventional Wisdom says you should not make them all the same.
Stuffing (for this size, true wool socks or blanket snips work great) damps the thump. A stuffed box will never sound like three towel-rolls.
And several very popular speaker systems are "cubes".
Thanks for your input.
Where would I find circuit theory for a 2.1 surround sound system? My guess is that the signal going to this single bass speaker is a combo/summing (amp) of the left & right signals, then through a low pass filter, then to a separate power amp.
That is: L+R summing amp > Lo-pass filter > audio amp > speaker. Would that be about right?
Speaking of that, that speaker that I said I built long ago happens to be a cube (and I still have it), just probably not optimized in its dimension measurements. However, I might be able to use that as a lone bass speaker, in between the 2 main speakers. I have already tested this cube speaker, running an audio signal from laptop to a low power amp (~2W), then in my audio software, I just reduced all frequencies except the lowest, around 60hz, and it sounds good, not bad or great, just good, for the moment, in this experiment.And several very popular speaker systems are "cubes".
Where would I find circuit theory for a 2.1 surround sound system? My guess is that the signal going to this single bass speaker is a combo/summing (amp) of the left & right signals, then through a low pass filter, then to a separate power amp.
That is: L+R summing amp > Lo-pass filter > audio amp > speaker. Would that be about right?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.