New subforum idea 2.

[oldeurope]

Continued from:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1630607#post1630607
(the texas section is visible for 'members' only.)

Hello Critofur
Thank you very much for your post (thread), I am with you.
This is a fan club and the 'Very Important Persons' don't have to care about the forum rules.
I collected some technical rules made by V.I.P. in the tube section.
If you want to take part in a technical discussion you have to accept the following rules:

µ = hfe_ hie = 1/hoe_ triodes don't change their characteristic at positiv grid voltages_ anode current is independent from g2 current in a pentode_ calculating the gain of a triode cathode follower you have to ignore the influence of µ_ ignore Loftin White_ ignore the fourth circuit topology_ tubes should be replaced by mosfets_ neutralisation is forbidden_ parafeed means ultrapath_continued ... 😉

Don't laugh, this is true here !!!

My favourite quote from thetexas section section:

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1481896#post1481896
"... It is a little like trying to teach a pig to sing; you know, it isn't very effective, and it annoys the pig.
My friends all accuse me of 'pig wrestling' when I spend time on the internet. About the same. ..."

Excellent!

 

[anatech]

Hi oldeurope,
You are attempting to circumvent a decision that was made by the moderating team by continuing a closed thread. You are obviously aware of this and the fact that it is not allowed.

I am closing this thread for this reason. If you reopen another thread, you will be "disregarding the directions from a moderator". We will probably award you some bin time for that. There are no surprises here.

This is a fan club and the 'Very Important Persons' don't have to care about the forum rules.

I think it would be really cool if you could at least be accurate. This statement is not true at all. There have been occasions where well known experts in their field have had actions taken against them. The one thing that the moderating team strives to do is approach everyone in a fair manner. If a problematic member runs into trouble, the actions taken will be more severe. This is because that particular member has been repeatedly guilty in some way. Just like in real life! How about that?

If you want to take part in a technical discussion you have to accept the following rules:

I don't understand what you are getting at here. If you post about a topic, you should be technically correct. That is the basis of science and all electronic devices obey the rules of physics. I didn't check each of your claims, but I will say that you can't go ahead and create your own version of physical laws. If you are complaining about the old subjective vs objective debate, there are threads that have dealt with that. Don't take another thread off topic if this is what you are attempting to do.

Don't laugh, this is true here !!!

Well, you are entitled to your own opinion. You are in error when you state it as fact.

Your link. Why are you bothering to quote something from Texas as a proof when those posts were removed? What are you getting at? If you wish to prove a point, get real proof that is acceptable to a greater number of members.

Lastly. If you disagree so strongly, why are you reading the threads you don't agree with? It seems to me like a great waste of time unless you enjoy torturing yourself. I'm sure there are some threads you enjoy and agree with. No one is forcing you to read the ones you don't like.

Since I have closed this thread, you can respond to me with my email link if you wish.

Best, Chris