New Headshell -- too light

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is a pretty simple question, I think...main table (for the next few weeks) is an AR XA. I broke the nubs on the cheap plastic headshell, and found a replacement from the XB-77 model -- same geometry but much lighter. While I think the lowered effective mass is a better match for my Grado Prestige cart (and certainly sounds better), it has trouble tracking. I put a dime on the headshell and the tracking force is correct but it still skips, and I lost the improved sonics.

I'm wondering if attaching a weight somehow to the underside of the arm, right in front of the pivot, would retain the low effective mass while increasing the tracking force. I need at least .5 grams of force, and I have no idea what that translates into so far back on the tube. The best I can think of is using a fishing sinker and line.

Obviously, I could get a heavier cart or get the matching aluminum counterweight, but I'm getting a thorens in 2 weeks and this is really a matter of curiosity and fun...plus having an immediate solution so I can play records while I wait.

Thanks to all who answer my silly questions -- keep teaching me and eventually I'll contribute something 🙂
 
Hi,

I must be missing something here regarding tracking weight and effective mass.

You should move the arm counterwieght forward to increase tracking weight.

Is the counterweight too heavy to do this ? i.e. already fully forward ?

In this case as a temporary measure you could pack a large blob
of blutack around the armtube in front of the pivot, enough such
that you get enough movement of the counterweight to allow
correct adjustment of tracking force.

🙂/sreten.
 
sreten said:

Is the counterweight too heavy to do this ? i.e. already fully forward ?

Yup
😡

I hadn't thought of Blu-tack! Which is weird since I use that stuff for everything. I was hoping to minimize ugliness, and I'm worried that the amount of weight required near the pivot to get a half gram or so at the headshell would require a LOT of blu-tack. But that's probably easier to do that attaching some kind of weight, and quieter. Thanks!

Nat
 
Well, it's ugly, but it works as well as the dime did. Unfortunately some records are still unplayble -- I assume the headshell is simply flimsy. But maybe when i get around to rewiring the arm I will stuff the back of the tube with blu-tack!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.