New diaphragms for JBL compression driver

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a chance tomorrow to pick up 2 JBL 2426H drivers for 70 bucks. They both need new diaphragms, coils are bad. Looking on Ebay I see JBL brand for 130 bucks, or after market ones for 20 or 30 bucks. Are the after market ones terrible, not bad or a total waste of money.
I am looking to pick these up to play and learn about horns. If I can use the after market diaphragms than I will only have about 120 bucks tied up into them. They come with short round wave guides, like a tweeter would use. Next I would have to buy larger wave guides to use these as a mid range horn.
Like I said, I'm just looking to play with these and maybe make a 2 way speaker system from them but I don't want to start spending a lot when I don't even have a game plan yet.

Thanks
BillWojo

I found a big difference between aftermarket and originals, I recommend you buy the originals.

Best
 
Both the 1225 ( for JBL ) and the 1228 ( meant for Altec ) are noticeably "softer" above 10K ( even when EQed ).

I attribute this to these Radian diaphragms having less UHF breakup due to the mylar surround.

Anecdotally;
Many users would be surprised that they might find each of these diaphragms less satisfying to listen to ( than the originals, if a tweeter isn't used ).

OTOH, it will usually take most people ( particularly on the forums ) some effort to admit that they might actually enjoy a bit of sonic tickle ( from spurious breakup, when "breakup" has become such a finger-wagging "no-no" ).

🙂

Thank you very much, EarlK
May you advice me some diaphragm to be good for high frequency response above 8Khz with coil diameter 1.75" (44.4mm)?
 
Thank you very much, EarlK
May you advice me some diaphragm to be good for high frequency response above 8Khz with coil diameter 1.75" (44.4mm)?

I ( strongly ) suspect that there's no after-market diaphragm that will out-perform the originals ( above 8K or below ).

For better performance ( in one response area or another ) consider buying a completely ( new ) driver.

Here's what Zilch measured ( 6+ years back ) for a GPA 902-8B on a 511a horn ( EQed with his Z19 network ).
- It'll sound smoother than what that pic suggests ( since his trace is fairly hiRez ).

GPA_902-8A_511A.PNG


Compare to the ( unEqualized ) GPA trace ( mostly unpublished );

802-8G_II_511B.png


Here's the "HF compensated & EQed" little Peerless Driver ( on the PRV 152i clone ).
- This is a crossover sim that uses real-world FR measurements ( so the trace is quite believable ).
- I forget which network this was / though I only published 2 ( so it is trackable over here! ).
PeerlessCD_QSC152i-Horn_Clone_Filter-Curve.png


Here's the Celestion CDX1-1747 on a 152i clone ( take note of the "squashed-optimistic" vertical scale ).

Celestion_CDX1-1747_on_152i_Horn-Clone_.png


I prefer my HF to be reproduced by an aluminum diaphragm ( I currently listen to an Altec 288-8K ) with tangential surround.
- So that's why I posted the GPA spec first. As always YMMV .

🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.