225 femtosecond! but in 12kHz-20MHz
here:
http://www.analog.com/en/subCat/0,2879,770%5F931%5F0%5F%5F0%5F,00.html
here:
http://www.analog.com/en/subCat/0,2879,770%5F931%5F0%5F%5F0%5F,00.html
When using PLL circuits main jitter performance is dependent of the jitter generated by VCXO.Look at this document:
http://focus.ti.com/docs/apps/catalog/resources/appnoteabstract.jhtml?abstractName=scaa067
It is jitter spec. of Ti CDC7005 with diferent VCXO's When acting as a buffer 1:1 ,jitter added to signal is only 11fs . Good low noise VCXO may cost much much more than 200$
Regards
http://focus.ti.com/docs/apps/catalog/resources/appnoteabstract.jhtml?abstractName=scaa067
It is jitter spec. of Ti CDC7005 with diferent VCXO's When acting as a buffer 1:1 ,jitter added to signal is only 11fs . Good low noise VCXO may cost much much more than 200$
Regards
Bricolo said:225 femtosecond! but in 12kHz-20MHz
here:
http://www.analog.com/en/subCat/0,2879,770%5F931%5F0%5F%5F0%5F,00.html
Hi
The short term jitter is of importance, but it is not that difficult to make that low. Ofcourse 12kHz jitter content is not that interesting.
The LF and sub LF counts when it comes to audibility, as the ear is much more sensitive there.
cheers
- Status
- Not open for further replies.