Don't forget the startup protection, there might be turnon thumps.
This is a very good point, and really required. Turn-on behavior is a bit nasty until things get settled.
It should be easy to modify your current layout for the TO-220 package for the 78xx/9xx, which will relieve any concern about SOA.
Your grounding is probably the weakest part of the layout (islands), but will probably be okay.
Ooops..
Wrong calculation!😀
The total dissipation would be 180mW not 18.. So youre right I think.. They must be TO220.. Will be fixed.
Sorry.
Wrong calculation!😀
The total dissipation would be 180mW not 18.. So youre right I think.. They must be TO220.. Will be fixed.
Sorry.
Originally posted by Dxvideo
So you wrote just before my PCB design posting?
even before... it was before Brian answer!

Then if you examined my layout, what can you say?
I applied two seperated gnd plate one is signal GND the other is dirty..
I'v tried to keep signal lines as short as possible and feeback lines are also very short (as I could make of course).
The only possible problem that I can see is, my input capacitor is very big (but its a really good cap and I dont want to leave him!) Do you think it causes any problem?
as Brian said... at a first glance more or less it looks good.
The input cap. is out of the NFB loop(s), so it's less of a problem... except for possible coupling with other parts of the circuit, which may create spurious feedback paths (and thus possibly oscillations). To avoid any trouble (and save some PCB space too), you may mount it off-board.
The large output currents are creating strong EMF: try keeping the output (and output sense resistor) as much as possible far away from anything else, and in particular from the input and input components (notice that overall the amplifier is non-inverting: any coupling of the output with the amplifier input would likely result in positive feedback and oscillations...).
Of course there must be a balance here, since the series sense resistor is inside both feedback loops and can't be placed far from the rest...
Dxvideo said:Ooops..
Wrong calculation!😀
The total dissipation would be 180mW not 18.. So youre right I think.. They must be TO220.. Will be fixed.
Sorry.
I have no looked too closely yet, but it looks like you are on the right track. I hope it works very well! 🙂
Cheers!
Russ
Mauro uses DC protection [and Served me already several times, always external causes not the circuit]
18mW is for sure Ok. Though maybe You wanted to say 180mW ?! Which is too much for TO92. Is it too much waste of room putting there a standard 78XX?
Don't turn down too much the PS, don't forget that this circuit produces some "waste" of power, You will need all that is available.
But You can try higher than 12V for the LM, also Mauro does this recently.
Ciao, George
Edit: oops, You all type too fast..😀
18mW is for sure Ok. Though maybe You wanted to say 180mW ?! Which is too much for TO92. Is it too much waste of room putting there a standard 78XX?
Don't turn down too much the PS, don't forget that this circuit produces some "waste" of power, You will need all that is available.
But You can try higher than 12V for the LM, also Mauro does this recently.
Ciao, George
Edit: oops, You all type too fast..😀
One more: maybe You will be sorry at a later moment for putting the input film cap right below C4. I mean maybe one time You might want to try to bypass also C4 with a film cap, from below..
Also, unless you have DC-offset from your source, you can leave out the input cap all together.
Joseph K said:One more: maybe You will be sorry at a later moment for putting the input film cap right below C4. I mean maybe one time You might want to try to bypass also C4 with a film cap, from below..
Dear Joseph,
You mean my input cap may cause some bad feelings?
Its a MKP capacitor and not cheap! In fact its an audio grade one.
But may be youre right, this is a strange design and may be a MKP doesnt suit for this design.
So you say; Take the input cap off board and try some different types of film caps (like MKT or Wima MKS 2,4 etc..) Is it?
BrianDonegan said:Also, unless you have DC-offset from your source, you can leave out the input cap all together.
I think the same way also...
But I am planning to make a imod to my ipod. And there is no space for a capacitor inside of my ipod. So I was planning to make my imod without a capacitor. Then in this case there may be a risk of DC offset..
Just a possibility!
No, I'm not talking about the input cap [I don't have it, like Brian has mentioned above]
I'm talking about the feedback cap, C4. It can be useful to leave space for bypassing it with a film cap, but You have placed the input cap below it, so now it's not possible.
Ciao, George
I'm talking about the feedback cap, C4. It can be useful to leave space for bypassing it with a film cap, but You have placed the input cap below it, so now it's not possible.
Ciao, George
Yeah.. I see!
I will give a space for him.. Do you think 5mm is enough? Like 100nF something?
I will give a space for him.. Do you think 5mm is enough? Like 100nF something?
The fixed version;
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
I think Joseph meant that you could put the bypass cap under the board on C4's pins.
You could leave the cap off the board all together, and insert it between the input connector and the pcb input, instead of wire.
You could leave the cap off the board all together, and insert it between the input connector and the pcb input, instead of wire.
Yes, I meant that, but this solution is good, also.
One last: don't skimp on the size/ quality of the bypass caps for the LM. for me higher voltage ones [fatter] worked well. Also, seems like Mauro in the original had managed to push them closer to the chip. But this is really just a detail, it's your decision.
Ciao, George
One last: don't skimp on the size/ quality of the bypass caps for the LM. for me higher voltage ones [fatter] worked well. Also, seems like Mauro in the original had managed to push them closer to the chip. But this is really just a detail, it's your decision.
Ciao, George
Youre talking about the supply bypasses is it?
The current ones are 63v Wima MKS2 type. But I can purchase biggers. Do you advice a brand and type?
The current ones are 63v Wima MKS2 type. But I can purchase biggers. Do you advice a brand and type?
Oh no, I'm talking about the LM318 bypass electrolytics.
By the way, the Wima MKs2 -s seem to be a good choice for the bypass - higher ESR, better damping less parallel resonance.
Ciao, George
By the way, the Wima MKs2 -s seem to be a good choice for the bypass - higher ESR, better damping less parallel resonance.
Ciao, George
I See.
The current electrolytics on LM318s rails are panasonic FM type (very low ESR) 100uF. As his datasheet, the current ripple of him is 470mA for 100Khz (half for 50hz)..
And OK..
I can move them closer to the chip (may be on underside 😀 as usual)
And for LM3886 I am using 1500uF also FM types (which have 3300mA ripple)..
The current electrolytics on LM318s rails are panasonic FM type (very low ESR) 100uF. As his datasheet, the current ripple of him is 470mA for 100Khz (half for 50hz)..
And OK..
I can move them closer to the chip (may be on underside 😀 as usual)
And for LM3886 I am using 1500uF also FM types (which have 3300mA ripple)..
I am cýrrently working on redesign of the PSU..
As I understand I must replace my power on delay circuit with the Mauros design..
I think I will post it tomorrow.
But for today I have a last question;
Do you know a good PCB maker which accepts international on line orders?
As I understand I must replace my power on delay circuit with the Mauros design..
I think I will post it tomorrow.
But for today I have a last question;
Do you know a good PCB maker which accepts international on line orders?
where did you get the 45 degree regulator package?
If you have a gerber file I can get you a quote from my factory...
It seems to be relativly cheap vs international averages...
If you have a gerber file I can get you a quote from my factory...
It seems to be relativly cheap vs international averages...
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Chip Amps
- My "audiophile" LM3886 approach