Biased (sighted) listening WILL mislead you into hearing incorrectly. Check this out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-lN8vWm3m0
Mike
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-lN8vWm3m0
Mike
I seldom spend time to do ABX, if I hear it, it matters, if not, I just don't worry about it. If I hear a difference but do not form a preference, that means more work to get to the source of the cause.
Right. So in this case, we have someone subjectively, in a sighted listening, confirming a claim made by a writer in a hi-fi journal?
Modulus-86: Composite amplifier achieving <0.0004 % THD+N.
At least 10 people individually ...
And probably at least 5 years after the article to about over 10 years after the article.
At least 10 people individually ...
And probably at least 5 years after the article to about over 10 years after the article.
Last edited:
Normally I would ask to switch the polarity, and just let them listen. Some will start asking to switch the polarity after that. Basically polarity change were not the subject of test, rather, the goal of the sessions were "tell me what you think about this design configuration". Then they will express whatever they feel. Some purposely just stick with whatever polarity because they do not think customers will care to do switching. If I ask them what they hear different between the different polarities, they will tell me and also express which they feel is more preferred. There were a few tests where the preferred were different from my list. There was one test unit where I myself preferred a different polarity, but when other problems were fixed, the polarity preference became consistent.
My feeling is that:
Some musical instruments when recorded using some microphones (and some mic techniques) and played back with some loudspeakers will have audible differences.
But some recording consoles have polarity switches on each channel and the engineer may switch some of the channels. That's to reduce mic to mic bleed-through.
Some musical instruments when recorded using some microphones (and some mic techniques) and played back with some loudspeakers will have audible differences.
But some recording consoles have polarity switches on each channel and the engineer may switch some of the channels. That's to reduce mic to mic bleed-through.
I did notice in one album that some instruments were inverted but some not, but since I could not decide which polarity was better, I just did not worry about it. Once I asked in a mic builders group how they determined the mic were not inverting, seemed like most had ignored the issue. I asked the question when I discovered I was always getting inverted phase in speaker measurements. Finally discovered the way the mic capsule was connected to the mic preamp would result in the inversion.
I have albums where the Top 40 hit track is in one polarity, and all other tracks in other polarity......mastering studios caused the inversions.I did notice in one album that some instruments were inverted but some not, but since I could not decide which polarity was better, I just did not worry about it.
Dan.
I have albums where the Top 40 hit track is in one polarity, and all other tracks in other polarity......mastering studios caused the inversions.
Dan.
Dan,
How do you know? Is there a way you can measure this?
How do you know? Is there a way you can measure this?
I assume the only way would be by looking at the beginning of a sound with an oscilloscope, and seeing if the wave starts with an up- or downgoing slope - but what is "correct"?
What if the situation that is most likely to give a positive is when your system (mostly the speakers) have significant asymmetric nonlinearities. Asymmetric waveforms in the recording will result in different levels of distortion from your speakers. Not only about clipping/bottoming out as proposed earlier (ref to Winer).
In such case bragging about hearing this (golden ears, hi rez speakers..) is bragging about your shitty speakers.
That would be a bit fun.
According to the studies I've seen (and own tests) the range around 100Hz to 300Hz is where we are most sensitive to waveform polarity/absolute phase. Try listening to a 150Hz ramp signal/sawtooth on a good speaker or headphones.
In such case bragging about hearing this (golden ears, hi rez speakers..) is bragging about your shitty speakers.
That would be a bit fun.
According to the studies I've seen (and own tests) the range around 100Hz to 300Hz is where we are most sensitive to waveform polarity/absolute phase. Try listening to a 150Hz ramp signal/sawtooth on a good speaker or headphones.
When listening to vocals, listening to how the vocalist uses lip, teeth, throat, etc. skills to express a song, the relationship in the sequester these characteristics are expressed is very important to feeling the emotion of the singer. The wrong polarity will cause somewhat softer teeth related sound. Other queues are also subtle...
I was evaluating possible adoption of binaural recording earphones and listened to some of the demo recording through EarPods, I did discover that they have inverted polarity. Comparatively the sound would feel like it was ballooning your head rather than having the sound field extending around you. I also listened to I TACEL CD which demonstrates various recording techniques which more correctly expressed the special queues when played in the correct polarity; when played back in the other polarity, the same ballooning your head feeling occurred.
I was evaluating possible adoption of binaural recording earphones and listened to some of the demo recording through EarPods, I did discover that they have inverted polarity. Comparatively the sound would feel like it was ballooning your head rather than having the sound field extending around you. I also listened to I TACEL CD which demonstrates various recording techniques which more correctly expressed the special queues when played in the correct polarity; when played back in the other polarity, the same ballooning your head feeling occurred.
Dan, George,
I located a plug in for Foobar to switch polarity and tried different kinds of music, as well as a saw tooth signal at multiples of 60 Hz. I am not saying that it is inaudible, but to me it is. Lucky me, one complication in life less.
Have you ever Foobar ABX-ed yourselves with two identical, except for polarity, files? Just to make sure your confidence also translates into real life statistics.
I located a plug in for Foobar to switch polarity and tried different kinds of music, as well as a saw tooth signal at multiples of 60 Hz. I am not saying that it is inaudible, but to me it is. Lucky me, one complication in life less.
Have you ever Foobar ABX-ed yourselves with two identical, except for polarity, files? Just to make sure your confidence also translates into real life statistics.
I'm waiting for a thread/poll where such a pair of files (better, several pair, with it being random which is inverted) are made available and votes are cast.Dan, George,
I located a plug in for Foobar to switch polarity and tried different kinds of music, as well as a saw tooth signal at multiples of 60 Hz. I am not saying that it is inaudible, but to me it is. Lucky me, one complication in life less.
Have you ever Foobar ABX-ed yourselves with two identical, except for polarity, files? Just to make sure your confidence also translates into real life statistics.
Make 'em FLAC files, for several reasons (lower storage space, more easily played than loaded into a waveform editor).
Dan, George,
I located a plug in for Foobar to switch polarity and tried different kinds of music, as well as a saw tooth signal at multiples of 60 Hz. I am not saying that it is inaudible, but to me it is. Lucky me, one complication in life less.
Have you ever Foobar ABX-ed yourselves with two identical, except for polarity, files? Just to make sure your confidence also translates into real life statistics.
You are fortunate enough not to worry about it. I specifically setup Jriver Media Center too deal with polarity switching for my normal listening. I did not worry about it until I improved driver CSD decay characteristics. So I can appreciate it when people do not find polarity of concern. The first person I demonstrated it to had been in the audio design business for a long time. He was amazed at the difference when I first demonstrated it to him at my place. I feel there are lots of things that need to be explored. I do take care to make sure drivers have pretty good BL and Km curves over the excursion, the only models that seem to be better in this aspect are a handful of Scan drivers as far as I am have seen. There are lots of other nonlinearies in drivers that are asymmetric, but are common among about all of the dynamic drivers.
The real interesting part of audio development is that different people find different aspects that they focus improvements on. For drivers, I focus on linearity and spectral decay characteristics, lot of these data are not published by the manufacturer and cannot be conveniently corrected for electronically.
Yeah... The thread has taken a turn towards The Lounge lately. It does that from time to time.
Tom
Tom
- Home
- Vendor's Bazaar
- Modulus-86: Composite amplifier achieving <0.0004 % THD+N.