For a couple of years I have Mission 73AP subwoofer (btw made 1997) and since last year when I upgraded my main speakers with double bass reflex enclosure (hybrid 26 inch ribbon and 6,5 inch mid woofer in 26l cabinet), it appear that present sub do not goes down enough. There are some information of the sub I found from the manual:
LF response 27Hz (-6dB) ???
X-over freq. control 50 – 150 Hz
Phase adjustement 0 – 180 deg.
Acoustic radiating area 450 cm sq. (equivalent to 12 inch)
Amplifier 120 Watt (100 Watt)
Internal volume 32l (about 1,13 cf)
Cabinet dim: 428 x 611 x 248 mm, bass reflex type
Last week I dismantled the sub and find on the bottom, two 20cm drivers with markings on the magnets as follows: Mission, 3A-LFGDN. A friend of mine said that they are probably made by Audax, and they indeed look like some 30cm Audax drivers I found on the internet, the type with inverted dust cap. The cones are made of black plastic, look alike. Both drivers are connected parallel to the amp output, although there are two separate inputs what surprise me a bit.There are also two flared duct ports, diameter 5cm and 21cm length. I put ducts dimensions and cabinet volume in the formula and it seems that the sub enclosure is tuned to 39Hz, what surprisingly corresponds to the same tuning point of my upgraded main speakers. Now it is clear to me why sub is almost not noticeable im my room when switched on.
Well, I am wondering, does anyone knows some more informations about a/m drivers, T/S parameters etc. Secondly, I would like to upgrade the sub. I want sound to be deep as possible with a/m drivers and amp, while the loudnes is not so important. Making of any size and type of enclosure is not problem for me.
Any suggestions?
Thank you in advance. 🙂
LF response 27Hz (-6dB) ???
X-over freq. control 50 – 150 Hz
Phase adjustement 0 – 180 deg.
Acoustic radiating area 450 cm sq. (equivalent to 12 inch)
Amplifier 120 Watt (100 Watt)
Internal volume 32l (about 1,13 cf)
Cabinet dim: 428 x 611 x 248 mm, bass reflex type
Last week I dismantled the sub and find on the bottom, two 20cm drivers with markings on the magnets as follows: Mission, 3A-LFGDN. A friend of mine said that they are probably made by Audax, and they indeed look like some 30cm Audax drivers I found on the internet, the type with inverted dust cap. The cones are made of black plastic, look alike. Both drivers are connected parallel to the amp output, although there are two separate inputs what surprise me a bit.There are also two flared duct ports, diameter 5cm and 21cm length. I put ducts dimensions and cabinet volume in the formula and it seems that the sub enclosure is tuned to 39Hz, what surprisingly corresponds to the same tuning point of my upgraded main speakers. Now it is clear to me why sub is almost not noticeable im my room when switched on.
Well, I am wondering, does anyone knows some more informations about a/m drivers, T/S parameters etc. Secondly, I would like to upgrade the sub. I want sound to be deep as possible with a/m drivers and amp, while the loudnes is not so important. Making of any size and type of enclosure is not problem for me.
Any suggestions?
Thank you in advance. 🙂
You would have to entend the vent length (which might not be physically possible) and add electronic equalisation (boost). That is assuming the design has not been done in this way already.
Basically it would be quite a major project.
Basically it would be quite a major project.
Yes, I know that with extension of duct port length and increase in cabinet size should lead to lower freq. but I do not know what are the limits as driver parameters are not known.

Unfortunately, I do not have neccessary equipment for measuring the driver parameters and this is one of the main reasons I posted the topic.
One think I forgot to mention on the first post is that I have a pair of very old KEF B-139, type 6171, nominal power 30 Watt , fundamental resonance 20Hz. They are still in good working order. Rubber surround is for sure a bit more stiff, but that would lead only to lower the resonance, I assume.
One of my earlier idea was to use Mission amp and drivers together with two KEF B-139 as a passive radiators all in one box. B-139 piston area is about 50 percent bigger than Mission 20cm woofer, and as I sow on other PR threads, that ratio is adequate to work properly.
If neccessary, the dditional weight could be easy attached on flat KEF surface. But the main question, what would be the sufficient size of the cabinet to cover the range starting form to app 20-24 Hz, again still remains.
Any thoughts?
One think I forgot to mention on the first post is that I have a pair of very old KEF B-139, type 6171, nominal power 30 Watt , fundamental resonance 20Hz. They are still in good working order. Rubber surround is for sure a bit more stiff, but that would lead only to lower the resonance, I assume.
One of my earlier idea was to use Mission amp and drivers together with two KEF B-139 as a passive radiators all in one box. B-139 piston area is about 50 percent bigger than Mission 20cm woofer, and as I sow on other PR threads, that ratio is adequate to work properly.
If neccessary, the dditional weight could be easy attached on flat KEF surface. But the main question, what would be the sufficient size of the cabinet to cover the range starting form to app 20-24 Hz, again still remains.
Any thoughts?
All you need is two resistors, reasonable power amp, and a millivolt meter and ohm meter. You already have a computer.
Maybe it sounds funny but I do not have PC at home. Looking to buy something new with LCD screen in near future.😎
Finally, I found the driver which looks totaly the same like the woofers employed in my sub, Audax HT210G10. The only difference is DC resistance. I measured 6,6 ohm what means that they are 8 ohm drivers. I think that as both drivers are conected to work in paralel, the Mission made special order to Audax for 8 ohm version.
Here are the links from official Audax site
http://www.hautparleur.fr/_audax/ht210g10.pdf
http://www.hautparleur.fr/_audax/ht210g10.jpg
As the freq.graph shows, 8 inch driver although defined as a woofer, do not show spectacular response bellow 100Hz, IMO.
Are there any suggestions for new enclosure which could give me deeper bass?
Thank's in advance
Here are the links from official Audax site
http://www.hautparleur.fr/_audax/ht210g10.pdf
http://www.hautparleur.fr/_audax/ht210g10.jpg
As the freq.graph shows, 8 inch driver although defined as a woofer, do not show spectacular response bellow 100Hz, IMO.
Are there any suggestions for new enclosure which could give me deeper bass?
Thank's in advance
If the drivers you have are 8 ohms it's safe to assume the Thiele-Small parameters will also be different from the 6 ohm spec driver.
Well, I am now really not sure what is actually the nominal impendance of the driver. On the first link it is quoted Z as 4 Ohm, while on the second link is quoted as 8 Ohm. The other parameters seems tobe the same on both links.
Can you not get into a lab or quiet place with a computer for 30 minutes and measure the speaker yourself?
Sorry for delay, I have been occupied with my regular job and could not reply earlier. The problem is solved but on the easiest way. During last weekened, I was thinking, what is actually going with my sub. I clearly remember the day when I bought it two years ago in the room of the seller, the sound was so powerfull and deep. Demonstration was with two little satelite Canton speakers, and the combination works realy fine. Later, in my room similar dimensions, the sound was a bit weaker but acceptable. From the last year when I upgrade my main speaker to play several notes deeper, the sub became hardly noticable. Now, I realize that previously, sub was positioned in the corner and probably gain few dB from that. Later I moved the sub between the speakers, possibly in the weeker room spot and due to improved main speakers, it became the bass to sound so thin.
Again, I played test CD with signal freq. range from 10Hz to 300Hz, 1Hz increments, separately on my main speakers and through the sub. I found out that the frequencies from 30Hz to about 60Hz, played through my main speakers, btw known with their low 84 dB sensitivity, are in fact louder than the sub and that lead me that obviously something there was not right. I must say that my 25 years old intetgrated Luxman L-530, have on the back side pre-out and amp-in chinch connectors, normaly short connected, and only through that points was possible to attach the cables for sub line inputs. So, there were not dedicated sub output on my integrated amp.
Than, idea came on my mind, I disconected sub signal cable from the my integrated and plug it directly to the CD player and, WOW. What a bass, deep and loud beganing from early 20 Hz. It seems that Mission put some equalization circuit inside the amp and their claiming 27Hz at -3dB now realy sound reasonable.
After all, the problem was in signal non compatibility between my integrated amp output and Mission active sub input. The input signal was to week and not adequate to push the sub plate amp.
For now, between my integrated amp and sub I inserted my old cassete deck Aiwa ADF-660 with monitor control, which add additional amplifiction, i.e. stronger singal to the amp plate. So, there is no need for any modification of sub as I previously ment. The final solution could be making of dedicated small signal amp. I have old spare CD player and think that it is possible to use his power supply, some of signal amp board and make additional signal amplification.
Well guys, if you think that your powered subwoofer play week, first check if the input line level signal is adequate.
Richie00boy, thank's for your input very much as your persisting questions, push me to think thoroughly and finaly find a solution.
Again, I played test CD with signal freq. range from 10Hz to 300Hz, 1Hz increments, separately on my main speakers and through the sub. I found out that the frequencies from 30Hz to about 60Hz, played through my main speakers, btw known with their low 84 dB sensitivity, are in fact louder than the sub and that lead me that obviously something there was not right. I must say that my 25 years old intetgrated Luxman L-530, have on the back side pre-out and amp-in chinch connectors, normaly short connected, and only through that points was possible to attach the cables for sub line inputs. So, there were not dedicated sub output on my integrated amp.
Than, idea came on my mind, I disconected sub signal cable from the my integrated and plug it directly to the CD player and, WOW. What a bass, deep and loud beganing from early 20 Hz. It seems that Mission put some equalization circuit inside the amp and their claiming 27Hz at -3dB now realy sound reasonable.
After all, the problem was in signal non compatibility between my integrated amp output and Mission active sub input. The input signal was to week and not adequate to push the sub plate amp.
For now, between my integrated amp and sub I inserted my old cassete deck Aiwa ADF-660 with monitor control, which add additional amplifiction, i.e. stronger singal to the amp plate. So, there is no need for any modification of sub as I previously ment. The final solution could be making of dedicated small signal amp. I have old spare CD player and think that it is possible to use his power supply, some of signal amp board and make additional signal amplification.
Well guys, if you think that your powered subwoofer play week, first check if the input line level signal is adequate.
Richie00boy, thank's for your input very much as your persisting questions, push me to think thoroughly and finaly find a solution.
Glad it worked out in the end. Sounds as though your amp may have already performed some low-pass filtering which interfered with the sub.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Subwoofers
- Mission 73AS sub upgrade (if possible)